CVE-2009-2570
What it is
Stack-based buffer overflow in the Symantec.FaxViewerControl.1 ActiveX control in WinFax\DCCFAXVW.DLL in Symantec WinFax Pro 10.03 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a long argument to the AppendFax method.
At a glance
- Exploitability
- Can be exploited over the network without logging in. High risk of data exposure, data tampering, service disruption.
- Exploit odds
- 11.9% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days (EPSS). Higher than most.
- Fix
- A patch, advisory or fixed version is referenced. Upgrade or apply it.
Timeline
- PublishedDisclosed publicly on CVE.org and NVD
- Last updatedMost recent change to the record
Why it ranks here
- Exploited in the wild: no, CISA does not list it.
- Exploit odds: 11.9% in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Severity: 9.3 HIGH (CVSS).
- Fix: a patch or advisory is linked.
Details
- Published
- Last modified
- Exploit probability
- 11.9% · EPSS, next 30 days
- Weakness
- CWE-119 · Buffer errors
- Record status
- Modified
Affected
- Symantec Winfax Pro 10.03
Attack profile CVSS 2.0 · 9.3
- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Medium
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Complete
- Integrity
- Complete
- Availability
- Complete
Raw vector
AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C
Is it in your code?
Hand this to your coding agent. It searches your project for the affected products and checks versions. Nothing leaves your machine.
Read https://cve-list.com/agent/cve/CVE-2009-2570.md and follow it. Check whether this project is affected by CVE-2009-2570. Read only. Don't change anything and don't upload my code. Tell me yes, no or not sure, with the file as proof.
Fix and advisories
- http://secunia.com/advisories/34925
- http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2009/1221
- http://secunia.com/advisories/34925
- http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2009/1221
References
- http://osvdb.org/54137
- http://retrogod.altervista.org/9sg_symantec_win_fuck_pro.html
- http://secunia.com/advisories/34925
- http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/503074/100/0/threaded
- http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/503086/100/0/threaded
- http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/503163/100/0/threaded
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/34766
- http://www.securitytracker.com/id?1022147
- http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2009/1221
- https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/security-updates/securitybulletins/2010/ms10-008
- http://osvdb.org/54137
- http://retrogod.altervista.org/9sg_symantec_win_fuck_pro.html
- http://secunia.com/advisories/34925
- http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/503074/100/0/threaded
- http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/503086/100/0/threaded
- http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/503163/100/0/threaded
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/34766
- http://www.securitytracker.com/id?1022147
- http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2009/1221
- https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/security-updates/securitybulletins/2010/ms10-008