CVE-2009-2474
What it is
neon before 0.28.6, when OpenSSL or GnuTLS is used, does not properly handle a '\0' character in a domain name in the subject's Common Name (CN) field of an X.509 certificate, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof arbitrary SSL servers via a crafted certificate issued by a legitimate Certification Authority, a related issue to CVE-2009-2408.
At a glance
- Exploitability
- Can be exploited over the network without logging in. Limited direct impact.
- Exploit odds
- 1.5% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Fix
- No patch or advisory is linked yet. Look at mitigations or restrict exposure.
Timeline
- PublishedDisclosed publicly on CVE.org and NVD
- Last updatedMost recent change to the record
Why it ranks here
- Exploited in the wild: no, CISA does not list it.
- Exploit odds: 1.5% in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Severity: 5.8 MEDIUM (CVSS).
- Fix: none linked yet, which raises it.
Details
- Published
- Last modified
- Exploit probability
- 1.5% · EPSS, next 30 days
- Weakness
- CWE-326 · Inadequate encryption strength
- Record status
- Modified
Affected
- Webdav Neon < 0.28.6
- Apple Mac Os X < 10.6.5
- Canonical Ubuntu Linux 6.06
- Canonical Ubuntu Linux 8.04
- Canonical Ubuntu Linux 8.10
- Canonical Ubuntu Linux 9.04
- Fedoraproject Fedora 10
- Fedoraproject Fedora 11
Attack profile CVSS 2.0 · 5.8
- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Medium
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Partial
- Integrity
- Partial
- Availability
- None
Raw vector
AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:N
Is it in your code?
Hand this to your coding agent. It searches your project for the affected products and checks versions. Nothing leaves your machine.
Read https://cve-list.com/agent/cve/CVE-2009-2474.md and follow it. Check whether this project is affected by CVE-2009-2474. Read only. Don't change anything and don't upload my code. Tell me yes, no or not sure, with the file as proof.
References
- http://lists.apple.com/archives/security-announce/2010//Nov/msg00000.html
- http://lists.manyfish.co.uk/pipermail/neon/2009-August/001044.html
- http://lists.manyfish.co.uk/pipermail/neon/2009-August/001046.html
- http://secunia.com/advisories/36371
- http://secunia.com/advisories/36799
- http://support.apple.com/kb/HT4435
- http://www.mandriva.com/security/advisories?name=MDVSA-2009:221
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/36079
- http://www.ubuntu.com/usn/usn-835-1
- http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2009/2341
- https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A11721
- https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-package-announce/2009-August/msg00924.html
- https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-package-announce/2009-August/msg00945.html
- http://lists.apple.com/archives/security-announce/2010//Nov/msg00000.html
- http://lists.manyfish.co.uk/pipermail/neon/2009-August/001044.html
- http://lists.manyfish.co.uk/pipermail/neon/2009-August/001046.html
- http://secunia.com/advisories/36371
- http://secunia.com/advisories/36799
- http://support.apple.com/kb/HT4435
- http://www.mandriva.com/security/advisories?name=MDVSA-2009:221
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/36079
- http://www.ubuntu.com/usn/usn-835-1
- http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2009/2341
- https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A11721
- https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-package-announce/2009-August/msg00924.html