CVE-2009-2404
What it is
Heap-based buffer overflow in a regular-expression parser in Mozilla Network Security Services (NSS) before 3.12.3, as used in Firefox, Thunderbird, SeaMonkey, Evolution, Pidgin, and AOL Instant Messenger (AIM), allows remote SSL servers to cause a denial of service (application crash) or possibly execute arbitrary code via a long domain name in the subject's Common Name (CN) field of an X.509 certificate, related to the cert_TestHostName function.
At a glance
- Exploitability
- Can be exploited over the network without logging in. High risk of data exposure, data tampering, service disruption.
- Exploit odds
- 4.2% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Fix
- A patch, advisory or fixed version is referenced. Upgrade or apply it.
Timeline
- PublishedDisclosed publicly on CVE.org and NVD
- Last updatedMost recent change to the record
Why it ranks here
- Exploited in the wild: no, CISA does not list it.
- Exploit odds: 4.2% in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Severity: 9.3 HIGH (CVSS).
- Fix: a patch or advisory is linked.
Details
- Published
- Last modified
- Exploit probability
- 4.2% · EPSS, next 30 days
- Weakness
- CWE-119 · Buffer errors
- Record status
- Modified
Affected
- Mozilla Network Security Services 3.12.3
Attack profile CVSS 2.0 · 9.3
- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Medium
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Complete
- Integrity
- Complete
- Availability
- Complete
Raw vector
AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C
Is it in your code?
Hand this to your coding agent. It searches your project for the affected products and checks versions. Nothing leaves your machine.
Read https://cve-list.com/agent/cve/CVE-2009-2404.md and follow it. Check whether this project is affected by CVE-2009-2404. Read only. Don't change anything and don't upload my code. Tell me yes, no or not sure, with the file as proof.
Fix and advisories
- http://secunia.com/advisories/36088
- http://secunia.com/advisories/36102
- http://secunia.com/advisories/36125
- http://secunia.com/advisories/36139
- http://secunia.com/advisories/36157
- http://www.mozilla.org/security/announce/2009/mfsa2009-43.html
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/35891
- http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2009/2085
- http://secunia.com/advisories/36088
- http://secunia.com/advisories/36102
References
- http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-1185.html
- http://secunia.com/advisories/36088
- http://secunia.com/advisories/36102
- http://secunia.com/advisories/36125
- http://secunia.com/advisories/36139
- http://secunia.com/advisories/36157
- http://secunia.com/advisories/36434
- http://secunia.com/advisories/37098
- http://secunia.com/advisories/39428
- http://sunsolve.sun.com/search/document.do?assetkey=1-66-273910-1
- http://sunsolve.sun.com/search/document.do?assetkey=1-77-1021030.1-1
- http://sunsolve.sun.com/search/document.do?assetkey=1-77-1021699.1-1
- http://www.blackhat.com/presentations/bh-usa-09/MARLINSPIKE/BHUSA09-Marlinspike-DefeatSSL-SLIDES.pdf
- http://www.debian.org/security/2009/dsa-1874
- http://www.mandriva.com/security/advisories?name=MDVSA-2009:197
- http://www.mandriva.com/security/advisories?name=MDVSA-2009:216
- http://www.mozilla.org/security/announce/2009/mfsa2009-43.html
- http://www.novell.com/linux/security/advisories/2009_48_firefox.html
- http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/cpuapr2010-099504.html
- http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2009-1207.html
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/35891
- http://www.ubuntu.com/usn/usn-810-1
- http://www.us-cert.gov/cas/techalerts/TA10-103B.html
- http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2009/2085
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512912