CVE-2009-2265
What it is
Multiple directory traversal vulnerabilities in FCKeditor before 2.6.4.1 allow remote attackers to create executable files in arbitrary directories via directory traversal sequences in the input to unspecified connector modules, as exploited in the wild for remote code execution in July 2009, related to the file browser and the editor/filemanager/connectors/ directory.
At a glance
- Exploitability
- Can be exploited over the network without logging in. Limited direct impact.
- Exploit odds
- 83.9% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days (EPSS). Higher than most.
- Fix
- A patch, advisory or fixed version is referenced. Upgrade or apply it.
Timeline
- ReservedThe CVE id was reserved by its CNA
- PublishedDisclosed publicly on CVE.org and NVD
- Last updatedMost recent change to the record
Why it ranks here
- Exploited in the wild: no, CISA does not list it.
- Exploit odds: 83.9% in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Severity: 7.5 HIGH (CVSS).
- Fix: a patch or advisory is linked.
Details
- Published
- Last modified
- Exploit probability
- 83.9% · EPSS, next 30 days
- Weakness
- CWE-22 · Path traversal
- Record status
- Modified
Affected
- Fckeditor ≤ 2.6.4
- Fckeditor 2.0
- Fckeditor 2.0_fc
- Fckeditor 2.0_rc2
- Fckeditor 2.0rc2
- Fckeditor 2.0rc3
- Fckeditor 2.1
- Fckeditor 2.1.1
Attack profile CVSS 2.0 · 7.5
- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Partial
- Integrity
- Partial
- Availability
- Partial
Raw vector
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
Is it in your code?
Hand this to your coding agent. It searches your project for the affected products and checks versions. Nothing leaves your machine.
Read https://cve-list.com/agent/cve/CVE-2009-2265.md and follow it. Check whether this project is affected by CVE-2009-2265. Read only. Don't change anything and don't upload my code. Tell me yes, no or not sure, with the file as proof.
Fix and advisories
- http://www.ocert.org/advisories/ocert-2009-007.html
- http://www.ocert.org/advisories/ocert-2009-007.html
References
- http://isc.sans.org/diary.html?storyid=6724
- http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-dev/2009-July/037195.html
- http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/163271/Adobe-ColdFusion-8-Remote-Command-Execution.html
- http://secunia.com/advisories/35833
- http://secunia.com/advisories/35909
- http://sourceforge.net/project/shownotes.php?release_id=695430
- http://www.debian.org/security/2009/dsa-1836
- http://www.ocert.org/advisories/ocert-2009-007.html
- http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/504721/100/0/threaded
- http://www.securitytracker.com/id?1022513
- http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2009/1813
- http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2009/1825
- https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-package-announce/2009-July/msg00710.html
- https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-package-announce/2009-July/msg00750.html
- http://isc.sans.org/diary.html?storyid=6724
- http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-dev/2009-July/037195.html
- http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/163271/Adobe-ColdFusion-8-Remote-Command-Execution.html
- http://secunia.com/advisories/35833
- http://secunia.com/advisories/35909
- http://sourceforge.net/project/shownotes.php?release_id=695430
- http://www.debian.org/security/2009/dsa-1836
- http://www.ocert.org/advisories/ocert-2009-007.html
- http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/504721/100/0/threaded
- http://www.securitytracker.com/id?1022513
- http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2009/1813