CVE-2009-1469
What it is
CRLF injection vulnerability in the Forgot Password implementation in server/webmail.php in IceWarp eMail Server and WebMail Server before 9.4.2 makes it easier for remote attackers to trick a user into disclosing credentials via CRLF sequences preceding a Reply-To header in the subject element of an XML document, as demonstrated by triggering an e-mail message from the server that contains a user's correct credentials, and requests that the user compose a reply that includes this message.
At a glance
- Exploitability
- Can be exploited over the network without logging in. Limited direct impact.
- Exploit odds
- 4.9% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Fix
- No patch or advisory is linked yet. Look at mitigations or restrict exposure.
Timeline
- PublishedDisclosed publicly on CVE.org and NVD
- Last updatedMost recent change to the record
Why it ranks here
- Exploited in the wild: no, CISA does not list it.
- Exploit odds: 4.9% in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Severity: 4.3 MEDIUM (CVSS).
- Fix: none linked yet, which raises it.
Details
- Published
- Last modified
- Exploit probability
- 4.9% · EPSS, next 30 days
- Weakness
- CWE-94 · Code injection
- Record status
- Modified
Affected
- Icewarp Email Server ≤ 9.3.0
- Icewarp Email Server 2.10.105
- Icewarp Email Server 2.10.110
- Icewarp Email Server 2.10.115
- Icewarp Email Server 2.10.140
- Icewarp Email Server 2.10.150
- Icewarp Email Server 2.10.165
- Icewarp Email Server 2.10.170
Attack profile CVSS 2.0 · 4.3
- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Medium
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Partial
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
Raw vector
AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
Is it in your code?
Hand this to your coding agent. It searches your project for the affected products and checks versions. Nothing leaves your machine.
Read https://cve-list.com/agent/cve/CVE-2009-1469.md and follow it. Check whether this project is affected by CVE-2009-1469. Read only. Don't change anything and don't upload my code. Tell me yes, no or not sure, with the file as proof.
References
- http://osvdb.org/54229
- http://www.redteam-pentesting.de/advisories/rt-sa-2009-004
- http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/503227/100/0/threaded
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/34827
- http://www.securitytracker.com/id?1022166
- http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2009/1253
- https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/50332
- http://osvdb.org/54229
- http://www.redteam-pentesting.de/advisories/rt-sa-2009-004
- http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/503227/100/0/threaded
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/34827
- http://www.securitytracker.com/id?1022166
- http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2009/1253
- https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/50332