CVE-2009-1195
What it is
The Apache HTTP Server 2.2.11 and earlier 2.2 versions does not properly handle Options=IncludesNOEXEC in the AllowOverride directive, which allows local users to gain privileges by configuring (1) Options Includes, (2) Options +Includes, or (3) Options +IncludesNOEXEC in a .htaccess file, and then inserting an exec element in a .shtml file.
At a glance
- Exploitability
- Can be exploited locally on the machine without logging in. High risk of service disruption.
- Exploit odds
- 2.0% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Fix
- A patch, advisory or fixed version is referenced. Upgrade or apply it.
Timeline
- PublishedDisclosed publicly on CVE.org and NVD
- Last updatedMost recent change to the record
Why it ranks here
- Exploited in the wild: no, CISA does not list it.
- Exploit odds: 2.0% in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Severity: 4.9 MEDIUM (CVSS).
- Fix: a patch or advisory is linked.
Details
- Published
- Last modified
- Exploit probability
- 2.0% · EPSS, next 30 days
- Weakness
- CWE-16
- Record status
- Modified
Affected
- Apache Http Server 2.2.0
- Apache Http Server 2.2.1
- Apache Http Server 2.2.2
- Apache Http Server 2.2.3
- Apache Http Server 2.2.4
- Apache Http Server 2.2.7
- Apache Http Server 2.2.8
- Apache Http Server 2.2.9
Attack profile CVSS 2.0 · 4.9
- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- Complete
Raw vector
AV:L/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:C
Is it in your code?
Hand this to your coding agent. It searches your project for the affected products and checks versions. Nothing leaves your machine.
Read https://cve-list.com/agent/cve/CVE-2009-1195.md and follow it. Check whether this project is affected by CVE-2009-1195. Read only. Don't change anything and don't upload my code. Tell me yes, no or not sure, with the file as proof.
Fix and advisories
- http://secunia.com/advisories/35264
- http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=772997
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489436
- http://secunia.com/advisories/35264
- http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=772997
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489436
References
- http://lists.apple.com/archives/security-announce/2009/Nov/msg00000.html
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2009-10/msg00006.html
- http://marc.info/?l=apache-httpd-dev&m=124048996106302&w=2
- http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=129190899612998&w=2
- http://osvdb.org/54733
- http://secunia.com/advisories/35261
- http://secunia.com/advisories/35264
- http://secunia.com/advisories/35395
- http://secunia.com/advisories/35453
- http://secunia.com/advisories/35721
- http://secunia.com/advisories/37152
- http://security.gentoo.org/glsa/glsa-200907-04.xml
- http://support.apple.com/kb/HT3937
- http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=772997
- http://wiki.rpath.com/Advisories:rPSA-2009-0142
- http://www.debian.org/security/2009/dsa-1816
- http://www.mandriva.com/security/advisories?name=MDVSA-2009:124
- http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2009-1075.html
- http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2009-1156.html
- http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/507852/100/0/threaded
- http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/507857/100/0/threaded
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/35115
- http://www.securitytracker.com/id?1022296
- http://www.ubuntu.com/usn/usn-787-1
- http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2009/1444