CVE-2009-1046
What it is
The console selection feature in the Linux kernel 2.6.28 before 2.6.28.4, 2.6.25, and possibly earlier versions, when the UTF-8 console is used, allows physically proximate attackers to cause a denial of service (memory corruption) by selecting a small number of 3-byte UTF-8 characters, which triggers an "off-by-two memory error." NOTE: it is not clear whether this issue crosses privilege boundaries.
At a glance
- Exploitability
- Can be exploited locally on the machine without logging in. High risk of service disruption.
- Exploit odds
- 0.8% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Fix
- A patch, advisory or fixed version is referenced. Upgrade or apply it.
Timeline
- PublishedDisclosed publicly on CVE.org and NVD
- Last updatedMost recent change to the record
Why it ranks here
- Exploited in the wild: no, CISA does not list it.
- Exploit odds: 0.8% in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Severity: 4.7 MEDIUM (CVSS).
- Fix: a patch or advisory is linked.
Details
- Published
- Last modified
- Exploit probability
- 0.8% · EPSS, next 30 days
- Weakness
- CWE-399
- Record status
- Modified
Affected
- Linux Kernel 2.6.25
- Linux Kernel 2.6.28
- Linux Kernel 2.6.28.1
- Linux Kernel 2.6.28.2
- Linux Kernel 2.6.28.3
Attack profile CVSS 2.0 · 4.7
- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Medium
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- Complete
Raw vector
AV:L/AC:M/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:C
Is it in your code?
Hand this to your coding agent. It searches your project for the affected products and checks versions. Nothing leaves your machine.
Read https://cve-list.com/agent/cve/CVE-2009-1046.md and follow it. Check whether this project is affected by CVE-2009-1046. Read only. Don't change anything and don't upload my code. Tell me yes, no or not sure, with the file as proof.
Fix and advisories
- http://lists.openwall.net/linux-kernel/2009/01/30/333
- http://lists.openwall.net/linux-kernel/2009/02/02/364
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/33672
- http://lists.openwall.net/linux-kernel/2009/01/30/333
- http://lists.openwall.net/linux-kernel/2009/02/02/364
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/33672
References
- http://lists.openwall.net/linux-kernel/2009/01/30/333
- http://lists.openwall.net/linux-kernel/2009/02/02/364
- http://secunia.com/advisories/34917
- http://secunia.com/advisories/34981
- http://secunia.com/advisories/35121
- http://www.debian.org/security/2009/dsa-1787
- http://www.debian.org/security/2009/dsa-1800
- http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/ChangeLog-2.6.28.4
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2009/02/12/10
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2009/02/12/11
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2009/02/12/9
- http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2009-0451.html
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/33672
- http://www.ubuntu.com/usn/usn-751-1
- http://lists.openwall.net/linux-kernel/2009/01/30/333
- http://lists.openwall.net/linux-kernel/2009/02/02/364
- http://secunia.com/advisories/34917
- http://secunia.com/advisories/34981
- http://secunia.com/advisories/35121
- http://www.debian.org/security/2009/dsa-1787
- http://www.debian.org/security/2009/dsa-1800
- http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/ChangeLog-2.6.28.4
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2009/02/12/10
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2009/02/12/11
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2009/02/12/9