CVE-2009-0582
What it is
The ntlm_challenge function in the NTLM SASL authentication mechanism in camel/camel-sasl-ntlm.c in Camel in Evolution Data Server (aka evolution-data-server) 2.24.5 and earlier, and 2.25.92 and earlier 2.25.x versions, does not validate whether a certain length value is consistent with the amount of data in a challenge packet, which allows remote mail servers to read information from the process memory of a client, or cause a denial of service (client crash), via an NTLM authentication type 2 packet with a length value that exceeds the amount of packet data.
At a glance
- Exploitability
- Can be exploited over the network without logging in. Limited direct impact.
- Exploit odds
- 2.3% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Fix
- A patch, advisory or fixed version is referenced. Upgrade or apply it.
Timeline
- PublishedDisclosed publicly on CVE.org and NVD
- Last updatedMost recent change to the record
Why it ranks here
- Exploited in the wild: no, CISA does not list it.
- Exploit odds: 2.3% in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Severity: 5.8 MEDIUM (CVSS).
- Fix: a patch or advisory is linked.
Details
- Published
- Last modified
- Exploit probability
- 2.3% · EPSS, next 30 days
- Weakness
- CWE-20 · Improper input validation
- Record status
- Modified
Affected
- Gnome evolution-data-server ≤ 2.24.5
- Gnome evolution-data-server 2.25.92
Attack profile CVSS 2.0 · 5.8
- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Medium
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Partial
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- Partial
Raw vector
AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:P
Is it in your code?
Hand this to your coding agent. It searches your project for the affected products and checks versions. Nothing leaves your machine.
Read https://cve-list.com/agent/cve/CVE-2009-0582.md and follow it. Check whether this project is affected by CVE-2009-0582. Read only. Don't change anything and don't upload my code. Tell me yes, no or not sure, with the file as proof.
Fix and advisories
References
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2009-05/msg00000.html
- http://mail.gnome.org/archives/release-team/2009-March/msg00096.html
- http://osvdb.org/52673
- http://secunia.com/advisories/34286
- http://secunia.com/advisories/34338
- http://secunia.com/advisories/34339
- http://secunia.com/advisories/34348
- http://secunia.com/advisories/34363
- http://secunia.com/advisories/35065
- http://secunia.com/advisories/35357
- http://securitytracker.com/id?1021845
- http://www.debian.org/security/2009/dsa-1813
- http://www.mandriva.com/security/advisories?name=MDVSA-2009:078
- http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2009-0354.html
- http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2009-0355.html
- http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2009-0358.html
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/34109
- http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2009/0716
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487685
- https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/49233
- https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A10081
- https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-package-announce/2009-March/msg00666.html
- https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-package-announce/2009-March/msg00672.html
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2009-05/msg00000.html
- http://mail.gnome.org/archives/release-team/2009-March/msg00096.html