CVE-2009-0579
What it is
Linux-PAM before 1.0.4 does not enforce the minimum password age (MINDAYS) as specified in /etc/shadow, which allows local users to bypass intended security policy and change their passwords sooner than specified.
At a glance
- Exploitability
- Can be exploited locally on the machine without logging in. Limited direct impact.
- Exploit odds
- 0.3% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Fix
- A patch, advisory or fixed version is referenced. Upgrade or apply it.
Timeline
- PublishedDisclosed publicly on CVE.org and NVD
- Last updatedMost recent change to the record
Why it ranks here
- Exploited in the wild: no, CISA does not list it.
- Exploit odds: 0.3% in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Severity: 4.6 MEDIUM (CVSS).
- Fix: a patch or advisory is linked.
Details
- Published
- Last modified
- Exploit probability
- 0.3% · EPSS, next 30 days
- Weakness
- CWE-264
- Record status
- Modified
Affected
- linux-pam ≤ 1.0.4
- linux-pam 0.99.1.0
- linux-pam 0.99.2.0
- linux-pam 0.99.2.1
- linux-pam 0.99.3.0
- linux-pam 0.99.4.0
- linux-pam 0.99.5.0
- linux-pam 0.99.6.0
Attack profile CVSS 2.0 · 4.6
- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Partial
- Integrity
- Partial
- Availability
- Partial
Raw vector
AV:L/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
Is it in your code?
Hand this to your coding agent. It searches your project for the affected products and checks versions. Nothing leaves your machine.
Read https://cve-list.com/agent/cve/CVE-2009-0579.md and follow it. Check whether this project is affected by CVE-2009-0579. Read only. Don't change anything and don't upload my code. Tell me yes, no or not sure, with the file as proof.
Fix and advisories
- http://secunia.com/advisories/34728
- http://secunia.com/advisories/34733
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487216
- https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-package-announce/2009-April/msg00420.html
- https://www.redhat.com/archives/pam-list/2009-March/msg00006.html
- http://secunia.com/advisories/34728
- http://secunia.com/advisories/34733
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487216
- https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-package-announce/2009-April/msg00420.html
- https://www.redhat.com/archives/pam-list/2009-March/msg00006.html
References
- http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=514437
- http://secunia.com/advisories/34728
- http://secunia.com/advisories/34733
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487216
- https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-package-announce/2009-April/msg00398.html
- https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-package-announce/2009-April/msg00420.html
- https://www.redhat.com/archives/pam-list/2009-March/msg00006.html
- http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=514437
- http://secunia.com/advisories/34728
- http://secunia.com/advisories/34733
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487216
- https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-package-announce/2009-April/msg00398.html
- https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-package-announce/2009-April/msg00420.html
- https://www.redhat.com/archives/pam-list/2009-March/msg00006.html