CVE-2009-0195
What it is
Heap-based buffer overflow in Xpdf 3.02pl2 and earlier, CUPS 1.3.9, and probably other products, allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a PDF file with crafted JBIG2 symbol dictionary segments.
At a glance
- Exploitability
- Can be exploited over the network without logging in. Limited direct impact.
- Exploit odds
- 5.4% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Fix
- A patch, advisory or fixed version is referenced. Upgrade or apply it.
Timeline
- PublishedDisclosed publicly on CVE.org and NVD
- Last updatedMost recent change to the record
Why it ranks here
- Exploited in the wild: no, CISA does not list it.
- Exploit odds: 5.4% in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Severity: 6.8 MEDIUM (CVSS).
- Fix: a patch or advisory is linked.
Details
- Published
- Last modified
- Exploit probability
- 5.4% · EPSS, next 30 days
- Weakness
- CWE-119 · Buffer errors
- Record status
- Modified
Affected
- Apple Cups 1.3.9
- Foolabs Xpdf 0.5a
- Foolabs Xpdf 0.7a
- Foolabs Xpdf 0.91a
- Foolabs Xpdf 0.91b
- Foolabs Xpdf 0.91c
- Foolabs Xpdf 0.92a
- Foolabs Xpdf 0.92b
Attack profile CVSS 2.0 · 6.8
- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Medium
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Partial
- Integrity
- Partial
- Availability
- Partial
Raw vector
AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
Is it in your code?
Hand this to your coding agent. It searches your project for the affected products and checks versions. Nothing leaves your machine.
Read https://cve-list.com/agent/cve/CVE-2009-0195.md and follow it. Check whether this project is affected by CVE-2009-0195. Read only. Don't change anything and don't upload my code. Tell me yes, no or not sure, with the file as proof.
Fix and advisories
- http://secunia.com/secunia_research/2009-17/
- http://secunia.com/secunia_research/2009-18/
- http://secunia.com/secunia_research/2009-17/
- http://secunia.com/secunia_research/2009-18/
References
- http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-0458.html
- http://secunia.com/advisories/34291
- http://secunia.com/advisories/34481
- http://secunia.com/advisories/34756
- http://secunia.com/advisories/34963
- http://secunia.com/advisories/35064
- http://secunia.com/secunia_research/2009-17/
- http://secunia.com/secunia_research/2009-18/
- http://www.mandriva.com/security/advisories?name=MDVSA-2010:087
- http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2009-0480.html
- http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/502759/100/0/threaded
- http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/502762/100/0/threaded
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/34791
- http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2010/1040
- https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A10076
- http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-0458.html
- http://secunia.com/advisories/34291
- http://secunia.com/advisories/34481
- http://secunia.com/advisories/34756
- http://secunia.com/advisories/34963
- http://secunia.com/advisories/35064
- http://secunia.com/secunia_research/2009-17/
- http://secunia.com/secunia_research/2009-18/
- http://www.mandriva.com/security/advisories?name=MDVSA-2010:087
- http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2009-0480.html