CVE-2009-0085
What it is
The Secure Channel (aka SChannel) authentication component in Microsoft Windows 2000 SP4, XP SP2 and SP3, Server 2003 SP1 and SP2, Vista Gold and SP1, and Server 2008, when certificate authentication is used, does not properly validate the client's key exchange data in Transport Layer Security (TLS) handshake messages, which allows remote attackers to spoof authentication by crafting a TLS packet based on knowledge of the certificate but not the private key, aka "SChannel Spoofing Vulnerability."
At a glance
- Exploitability
- Can be exploited over the network without logging in. High risk of data tampering.
- Exploit odds
- 15.2% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days (EPSS). Higher than most.
- Fix
- No patch or advisory is linked yet. Look at mitigations or restrict exposure.
Timeline
- PublishedDisclosed publicly on CVE.org and NVD
- Last updatedMost recent change to the record
Why it ranks here
- Exploited in the wild: no, CISA does not list it.
- Exploit odds: 15.2% in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Severity: 7.1 HIGH (CVSS).
- Fix: none linked yet, which raises it.
Details
- Published
- Last modified
- Exploit probability
- 15.2% · EPSS, next 30 days
- Weakness
- CWE-287 · Improper authentication
- Record status
- Modified
Affected
- Microsoft Windows 2000
- Microsoft Windows Server 2003
- Microsoft Windows Server 2008
- Microsoft Windows Vista
- Microsoft Windows Vista Gold
- Microsoft Windows Xp
Attack profile CVSS 2.0 · 7.1
- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Medium
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- Complete
- Availability
- None
Raw vector
AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:N/I:C/A:N
Is it in your code?
Hand this to your coding agent. It searches your project for the affected products and checks versions. Nothing leaves your machine.
Read https://cve-list.com/agent/cve/CVE-2009-0085.md and follow it. Check whether this project is affected by CVE-2009-0085. Read only. Don't change anything and don't upload my code. Tell me yes, no or not sure, with the file as proof.
References
- http://osvdb.org/52521
- http://secunia.com/advisories/34215
- http://www.securitytracker.com/id?1021828
- http://www.us-cert.gov/cas/techalerts/TA09-069A.html
- http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2009/0660
- https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/security-updates/securitybulletins/2009/ms09-007
- https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A6011
- http://osvdb.org/52521
- http://secunia.com/advisories/34215
- http://www.securitytracker.com/id?1021828
- http://www.us-cert.gov/cas/techalerts/TA09-069A.html
- http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2009/0660
- https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/security-updates/securitybulletins/2009/ms09-007
- https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A6011