CVE-2009-0055
What it is
Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the administration interface in Cisco IronPort Encryption Appliance 6.2.4 before 6.2.4.1.1, 6.2.5, 6.2.6, 6.2.7 before 6.2.7.7, 6.3 before 6.3.0.4, and 6.5 before 6.5.0.2; and Cisco IronPort PostX 6.2.1 before 6.2.1.1 and 6.2.2 before 6.2.2.3; allows remote attackers to modify appliance preferences as arbitrary users via unspecified vectors.
At a glance
- Exploitability
- Can be exploited over the network without logging in. Limited direct impact.
- Exploit odds
- 0.4% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Fix
- A patch, advisory or fixed version is referenced. Upgrade or apply it.
Timeline
- PublishedDisclosed publicly on CVE.org and NVD
- Last updatedMost recent change to the record
Why it ranks here
- Exploited in the wild: no, CISA does not list it.
- Exploit odds: 0.4% in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Severity: 6.8 MEDIUM (CVSS).
- Fix: a patch or advisory is linked.
Details
- Published
- Last modified
- Exploit probability
- 0.4% · EPSS, next 30 days
- Weakness
- CWE-352 · Cross-site request forgery
- Record status
- Modified
Affected
- Cisco Ironport Encryption Appliance 6.2.4
- Cisco Ironport Encryption Appliance 6.2.4.1
- Cisco Ironport Encryption Appliance 6.2.5
- Cisco Ironport Encryption Appliance 6.2.6
- Cisco Ironport Encryption Appliance 6.2.7
- Cisco Ironport Encryption Appliance 6.2.7.1
- Cisco Ironport Encryption Appliance 6.2.7.2
- Cisco Ironport Encryption Appliance 6.2.7.3
Attack profile CVSS 2.0 · 6.8
- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Medium
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Partial
- Integrity
- Partial
- Availability
- Partial
Raw vector
AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
Is it in your code?
Hand this to your coding agent. It searches your project for the affected products and checks versions. Nothing leaves your machine.
Read https://cve-list.com/agent/cve/CVE-2009-0055.md and follow it. Check whether this project is affected by CVE-2009-0055. Read only. Don't change anything and don't upload my code. Tell me yes, no or not sure, with the file as proof.
Fix and advisories
- http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/products_security_advisory09186a0080a5c4f7.shtml
- http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/products_security_advisory09186a0080a5c4f7.shtml
References
- http://osvdb.org/51397
- http://secunia.com/advisories/33479
- http://securitytracker.com/id?1021594
- http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/products_security_advisory09186a0080a5c4f7.shtml
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/33268
- http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2009/0140
- http://osvdb.org/51397
- http://secunia.com/advisories/33479
- http://securitytracker.com/id?1021594
- http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/products_security_advisory09186a0080a5c4f7.shtml
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/33268
- http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2009/0140