CVE-2009-0021
What it is
NTP 4.2.4 before 4.2.4p5 and 4.2.5 before 4.2.5p150 does not properly check the return value from the OpenSSL EVP_VerifyFinal function, which allows remote attackers to bypass validation of the certificate chain via a malformed SSL/TLS signature for DSA and ECDSA keys, a similar vulnerability to CVE-2008-5077.
At a glance
- Exploitability
- Can be exploited over the network without logging in. Limited direct impact.
- Exploit odds
- 3.2% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Fix
- A patch, advisory or fixed version is referenced. Upgrade or apply it.
Timeline
- PublishedDisclosed publicly on CVE.org and NVD
- Last updatedMost recent change to the record
Why it ranks here
- Exploited in the wild: no, CISA does not list it.
- Exploit odds: 3.2% in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Severity: 5.0 MEDIUM (CVSS).
- Fix: a patch or advisory is linked.
Details
- Published
- Last modified
- Exploit probability
- 3.2% · EPSS, next 30 days
- Weakness
- CWE-287 · Improper authentication
- Record status
- Modified
Affected
- Ntp ≤ 4.2.4p4
- Ntp 4.2.0
- Ntp 4.2.2
- Ntp 4.2.4p1
- Ntp 4.2.4p2
- Ntp 4.2.4p3
Attack profile CVSS 2.0 · 5.0
- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Partial
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
Raw vector
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
Is it in your code?
Hand this to your coding agent. It searches your project for the affected products and checks versions. Nothing leaves your machine.
Read https://cve-list.com/agent/cve/CVE-2009-0021.md and follow it. Check whether this project is affected by CVE-2009-0021. Read only. Don't change anything and don't upload my code. Tell me yes, no or not sure, with the file as proof.
Fix and advisories
- http://secunia.com/advisories/33406
- http://secunia.com/advisories/33558
- http://secunia.com/advisories/33648
- http://secunia.com/advisories/34642
- http://secunia.com/advisories/35074
- http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2009/0042
- http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2009/1297
- http://secunia.com/advisories/33406
- http://secunia.com/advisories/33558
- http://secunia.com/advisories/33648
References
- http://lists.apple.com/archives/security-announce/2009/May/msg00002.html
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2009-03/msg00000.html
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2009-04/msg00003.html
- http://secunia.com/advisories/33406
- http://secunia.com/advisories/33558
- http://secunia.com/advisories/33648
- http://secunia.com/advisories/34642
- http://secunia.com/advisories/35074
- http://slackware.com/security/viewer.php?l=slackware-security&y=2009&m=slackware-security.531177
- http://support.apple.com/kb/HT3549
- http://www.ocert.org/advisories/ocert-2008-016.html
- http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2009-0046.html
- http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/499827/100/0/threaded
- http://www.securitytracker.com/id?1021533
- http://www.us-cert.gov/cas/techalerts/TA09-133A.html
- http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2009/0042
- http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2009/1297
- https://lists.ntp.org/pipermail/announce/2009-January/000055.html
- https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A10035
- http://lists.apple.com/archives/security-announce/2009/May/msg00002.html
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2009-03/msg00000.html
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2009-04/msg00003.html
- http://secunia.com/advisories/33406
- http://secunia.com/advisories/33558
- http://secunia.com/advisories/33648