CVE-2008-7270
What it is
OpenSSL before 0.9.8j, when SSL_OP_NETSCAPE_REUSE_CIPHER_CHANGE_BUG is enabled, does not prevent modification of the ciphersuite in the session cache, which allows remote attackers to force the use of a disabled cipher via vectors involving sniffing network traffic to discover a session identifier, a different vulnerability than CVE-2010-4180.
At a glance
- Exploitability
- Can be exploited over the network without logging in. Limited direct impact.
- Exploit odds
- 3.4% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Fix
- A patch, advisory or fixed version is referenced. Upgrade or apply it.
Timeline
- PublishedDisclosed publicly on CVE.org and NVD
- Last updatedMost recent change to the record
Why it ranks here
- Exploited in the wild: no, CISA does not list it.
- Exploit odds: 3.4% in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Severity: 4.3 MEDIUM (CVSS).
- Fix: a patch or advisory is linked.
Details
- Published
- Last modified
- Exploit probability
- 3.4% · EPSS, next 30 days
- Weakness
- CWE-310
- Record status
- Modified
Affected
- OpenSSL ≤ 0.9.8i
- OpenSSL 0.9.1c
- OpenSSL 0.9.2b
- OpenSSL 0.9.3
- OpenSSL 0.9.3a
- OpenSSL 0.9.4
- OpenSSL 0.9.5
- OpenSSL 0.9.5a
Attack profile CVSS 2.0 · 4.3
- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Medium
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- Partial
- Availability
- None
Raw vector
AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
Is it in your code?
Hand this to your coding agent. It searches your project for the affected products and checks versions. Nothing leaves your machine.
Read https://cve-list.com/agent/cve/CVE-2008-7270.md and follow it. Check whether this project is affected by CVE-2008-7270. Read only. Don't change anything and don't upload my code. Tell me yes, no or not sure, with the file as proof.
Fix and advisories
References
- http://cvs.openssl.org/chngview?cn=17489
- http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=132077688910227&w=2
- http://secunia.com/advisories/42493
- http://ubuntu.com/usn/usn-1029-1
- http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2010-0977.html
- http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2010-0978.html
- http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2011-0896.html
- http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/522176
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/45254
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=659462
- http://cvs.openssl.org/chngview?cn=17489
- http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=132077688910227&w=2
- http://secunia.com/advisories/42493
- http://ubuntu.com/usn/usn-1029-1
- http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2010-0977.html
- http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2010-0978.html
- http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2011-0896.html
- http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/522176
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/45254
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=659462