CVE-2008-5718
What it is
The papd daemon in Netatalk before 2.0.4-beta2, when using certain variables in a pipe command for the print file, allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands via shell metacharacters in a print request, as demonstrated using a crafted Title.
At a glance
- Exploitability
- Can be exploited over the network without logging in. High risk of data exposure, data tampering, service disruption.
- Exploit odds
- 4.5% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Fix
- A patch, advisory or fixed version is referenced. Upgrade or apply it.
Timeline
- PublishedDisclosed publicly on CVE.org and NVD
- Last updatedMost recent change to the record
Why it ranks here
- Exploited in the wild: no, CISA does not list it.
- Exploit odds: 4.5% in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Severity: 9.3 HIGH (CVSS).
- Fix: a patch or advisory is linked.
Details
- Published
- Last modified
- Exploit probability
- 4.5% · EPSS, next 30 days
- Weakness
- CWE-78 · OS command injection
- Record status
- Modified
Affected
- Netatalk ≤ 2.0.3
- Netatalk 1.4.99-0.20000927
- Netatalk 1.4.99-0.20001108
- Netatalk 1.5
- Netatalk 1.5.0
- Netatalk 1.5.1
- Netatalk 1.5.1.1
- Netatalk 1.5.2
Attack profile CVSS 2.0 · 9.3
- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Medium
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Complete
- Integrity
- Complete
- Availability
- Complete
Raw vector
AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C
Is it in your code?
Hand this to your coding agent. It searches your project for the affected products and checks versions. Nothing leaves your machine.
Read https://cve-list.com/agent/cve/CVE-2008-5718.md and follow it. Check whether this project is affected by CVE-2008-5718. Read only. Don't change anything and don't upload my code. Tell me yes, no or not sure, with the file as proof.
Fix and advisories
- http://secunia.com/advisories/33227
- http://secunia.com/advisories/33548
- http://secunia.com/advisories/34484
- http://www.debian.org/security/2009/dsa-1705
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/32925
- http://secunia.com/advisories/33227
- http://secunia.com/advisories/33548
- http://secunia.com/advisories/34484
- http://www.debian.org/security/2009/dsa-1705
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/32925
References
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2009-02/msg00002.html
- http://osvdb.org/50824
- http://secunia.com/advisories/33227
- http://secunia.com/advisories/33548
- http://secunia.com/advisories/34484
- http://sourceforge.net/project/shownotes.php?release_id=648189
- http://www.debian.org/security/2009/dsa-1705
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2009/01/13/3
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/32925
- https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-package-announce/2009-March/msg00962.html
- https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-package-announce/2009-March/msg00966.html
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2009-02/msg00002.html
- http://osvdb.org/50824
- http://secunia.com/advisories/33227
- http://secunia.com/advisories/33548
- http://secunia.com/advisories/34484
- http://sourceforge.net/project/shownotes.php?release_id=648189
- http://www.debian.org/security/2009/dsa-1705
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2009/01/13/3
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/32925
- https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-package-announce/2009-March/msg00962.html
- https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-package-announce/2009-March/msg00966.html