CVE-2008-5025
What it is
Stack-based buffer overflow in the hfs_cat_find_brec function in fs/hfs/catalog.c in the Linux kernel before 2.6.28-rc1 allows attackers to cause a denial of service (memory corruption or system crash) via an hfs filesystem image with an invalid catalog namelength field, a related issue to CVE-2008-4933.
At a glance
- Exploitability
- Can be exploited over the network without logging in. High risk of service disruption.
- Exploit odds
- 3.0% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Fix
- No patch or advisory is linked yet. Look at mitigations or restrict exposure.
Timeline
- PublishedDisclosed publicly on CVE.org and NVD
- Last updatedMost recent change to the record
Why it ranks here
- Exploited in the wild: no, CISA does not list it.
- Exploit odds: 3.0% in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Severity: 7.8 HIGH (CVSS).
- Fix: none linked yet, which raises it.
Details
- Published
- Last modified
- Exploit probability
- 3.0% · EPSS, next 30 days
- Weakness
- CWE-119 · Buffer errors
- Record status
- Modified
Affected
- Linux Kernel ≤ 2.6.28
- Linux Kernel 2.2.27
- Linux Kernel 2.4.36
- Linux Kernel 2.4.36.1
- Linux Kernel 2.4.36.2
- Linux Kernel 2.4.36.3
- Linux Kernel 2.4.36.4
- Linux Kernel 2.4.36.5
Attack profile CVSS 2.0 · 7.8
- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- Complete
Raw vector
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:C
Is it in your code?
Hand this to your coding agent. It searches your project for the affected products and checks versions. Nothing leaves your machine.
Read https://cve-list.com/agent/cve/CVE-2008-5025.md and follow it. Check whether this project is affected by CVE-2008-5025. Read only. Don't change anything and don't upload my code. Tell me yes, no or not sure, with the file as proof.
References
- http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-2.6.27.y.git%3Ba=commit%3Bh=d38b7aa7fc3371b52d036748028db50b585ade2e
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2009-01/msg00006.html
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2009-01/msg00010.html
- http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2008/11/10/1
- http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2008/11/10/3
- http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2008/11/10/6
- http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2008/11/10/7
- http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2008/11/11/1
- http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2008/11/11/12
- http://osvdb.org/49863
- http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-0264.html
- http://secunia.com/advisories/32719
- http://secunia.com/advisories/32918
- http://secunia.com/advisories/32998
- http://secunia.com/advisories/33180
- http://secunia.com/advisories/33556
- http://secunia.com/advisories/33641
- http://secunia.com/advisories/33704
- http://secunia.com/advisories/33858
- http://www.debian.org/security/2008/dsa-1681
- http://www.debian.org/security/2008/dsa-1687
- http://www.mandriva.com/security/advisories?name=MDVSA-2008:246
- http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2009-0014.html
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/32289
- http://www.securitytracker.com/id?1021230