CVE-2008-4609
What it is
The TCP implementation in (1) Linux, (2) platforms based on BSD Unix, (3) Microsoft Windows, (4) Cisco products, and probably other operating systems allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (connection queue exhaustion) via multiple vectors that manipulate information in the TCP state table, as demonstrated by sockstress.
At a glance
- Exploitability
- Can be exploited over the network without logging in. High risk of service disruption.
- Exploit odds
- 32.4% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days (EPSS). Higher than most.
- Fix
- A patch, advisory or fixed version is referenced. Upgrade or apply it.
Timeline
- PublishedDisclosed publicly on CVE.org and NVD
- Last updatedMost recent change to the record
Why it ranks here
- Exploited in the wild: no, CISA does not list it.
- Exploit odds: 32.4% in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Severity: 7.1 HIGH (CVSS).
- Fix: a patch or advisory is linked.
Details
- Published
- Last modified
- Exploit probability
- 32.4% · EPSS, next 30 days
- Weakness
- CWE-16
- Record status
- Modified
Affected
- Bsd
- Bsd 4.1
- Bsd 4.2
- Bsd 4.3
- Bsd 4.4
- Bsdi Bsd Os
- Bsdi Bsd Os 1.1
- Bsdi Bsd Os 2.0
Attack profile CVSS 2.0 · 7.1
- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Medium
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- Complete
Raw vector
AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:C
Is it in your code?
Hand this to your coding agent. It searches your project for the affected products and checks versions. Nothing leaves your machine.
Read https://cve-list.com/agent/cve/CVE-2008-4609.md and follow it. Check whether this project is affected by CVE-2008-4609. Read only. Don't change anything and don't upload my code. Tell me yes, no or not sure, with the file as proof.
Fix and advisories
- https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/security-updates/securitybulletins/2009/ms09-048
- https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/security-updates/securitybulletins/2009/ms09-048
References
- http://blog.robertlee.name/2008/10/conjecture-speculation.html
- http://insecure.org/stf/tcp-dos-attack-explained.html
- http://lists.immunitysec.com/pipermail/dailydave/2008-October/005360.html
- http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=125856010926699&w=2
- http://searchsecurity.techtarget.com.au/articles/27154-TCP-is-fundamentally-borked
- http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/products_security_advisory09186a0080af511d.shtml
- http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/products_security_response09186a0080a15120.html
- http://www.cpni.gov.uk/Docs/tn-03-09-security-assessment-TCP.pdf
- http://www.mandriva.com/security/advisories?name=MDVSA-2013:150
- http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/cpujul2012-392727.html
- http://www.outpost24.com/news/news-2008-10-02.html
- http://www.us-cert.gov/cas/techalerts/TA09-251A.html
- https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/security-updates/securitybulletins/2009/ms09-048
- https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A6340
- https://www.cert.fi/haavoittuvuudet/2008/tcp-vulnerabilities.html
- http://blog.robertlee.name/2008/10/conjecture-speculation.html
- http://insecure.org/stf/tcp-dos-attack-explained.html
- http://lists.immunitysec.com/pipermail/dailydave/2008-October/005360.html
- http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=125856010926699&w=2
- http://searchsecurity.techtarget.com.au/articles/27154-TCP-is-fundamentally-borked
- http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/products_security_advisory09186a0080af511d.shtml
- http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/products_security_response09186a0080a15120.html
- http://www.cpni.gov.uk/Docs/tn-03-09-security-assessment-TCP.pdf
- http://www.mandriva.com/security/advisories?name=MDVSA-2013:150
- http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/cpujul2012-392727.html