CVE-2008-4308
What it is
The doRead method in Apache Tomcat 4.1.32 through 4.1.34 and 5.5.10 through 5.5.20 does not return a -1 to indicate when a certain error condition has occurred, which can cause Tomcat to send POST content from one request to a different request.
At a glance
- Exploitability
- Can be exploited over the network without logging in. Limited direct impact.
- Exploit odds
- 4.2% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Fix
- A patch, advisory or fixed version is referenced. Upgrade or apply it.
Timeline
- PublishedDisclosed publicly on CVE.org and NVD
- Last updatedMost recent change to the record
Why it ranks here
- Exploited in the wild: no, CISA does not list it.
- Exploit odds: 4.2% in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Severity: 2.6 LOW (CVSS).
- Fix: a patch or advisory is linked.
Details
- Published
- Last modified
- Exploit probability
- 4.2% · EPSS, next 30 days
- Weakness
- CWE-200 · Information exposure
- Record status
- Modified
Affected
- Apache Tomcat 4.1.32
- Apache Tomcat 4.1.33
- Apache Tomcat 4.1.34
- Apache Tomcat 5.5.10
- Apache Tomcat 5.5.11
- Apache Tomcat 5.5.12
- Apache Tomcat 5.5.13
- Apache Tomcat 5.5.14
Attack profile CVSS 2.0 · 2.6
- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- High
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Partial
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
Raw vector
AV:N/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
Is it in your code?
Hand this to your coding agent. It searches your project for the affected products and checks versions. Nothing leaves your machine.
Read https://cve-list.com/agent/cve/CVE-2008-4308.md and follow it. Check whether this project is affected by CVE-2008-4308. Read only. Don't change anything and don't upload my code. Tell me yes, no or not sure, with the file as proof.
Fix and advisories
- http://secunia.com/advisories/34057
- http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2009/0541
- https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40771
- http://secunia.com/advisories/34057
- http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2009/0541
- https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40771
References
- http://jvn.jp/en/jp/JVN66905322/index.html
- http://jvndb.jvn.jp/ja/contents/2009/JVNDB-2009-000010.html
- http://secunia.com/advisories/34057
- http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/501250
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/33913
- http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2009/0541
- https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40771
- https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/29dc6c2b625789e70a9c4756b5a327e6547273ff8bde7e0327af48c5%40%3Cdev.tomcat.apache.org%3E
- https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/c62b0e3a7bf23342352a5810c640a94b6db69957c5c19db507004d74%40%3Cdev.tomcat.apache.org%3E
- https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rb71997f506c6cc8b530dd845c084995a9878098846c7b4eacfae8db3%40%3Cdev.tomcat.apache.org%3E
- http://jvn.jp/en/jp/JVN66905322/index.html
- http://jvndb.jvn.jp/ja/contents/2009/JVNDB-2009-000010.html
- http://secunia.com/advisories/34057
- http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/501250
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/33913
- http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2009/0541
- https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40771
- https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/29dc6c2b625789e70a9c4756b5a327e6547273ff8bde7e0327af48c5%40%3Cdev.tomcat.apache.org%3E
- https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/c62b0e3a7bf23342352a5810c640a94b6db69957c5c19db507004d74%40%3Cdev.tomcat.apache.org%3E
- https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rb71997f506c6cc8b530dd845c084995a9878098846c7b4eacfae8db3%40%3Cdev.tomcat.apache.org%3E