CVE-2008-4292
What it is
Opera before 9.52 does not check the CRL override upon encountering a certificate that lacks a CRL, which has unknown impact and attack vectors. NOTE: it is not clear whether this is a vulnerability, but the vendor included it in a security section of the advisory.
At a glance
- Exploitability
- Can be exploited over the network without logging in. High risk of data exposure, data tampering, service disruption.
- Exploit odds
- 1.9% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Fix
- A patch, advisory or fixed version is referenced. Upgrade or apply it.
Timeline
- PublishedDisclosed publicly on CVE.org and NVD
- Last updatedMost recent change to the record
Why it ranks here
- Exploited in the wild: no, CISA does not list it.
- Exploit odds: 1.9% in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Severity: 10.0 HIGH (CVSS).
- Fix: a patch or advisory is linked.
Details
- Published
- Last modified
- Exploit probability
- 1.9% · EPSS, next 30 days
- Weakness
- CWE-255
- Record status
- Modified
Affected
- Opera Browser ≤ 9.51
- Opera Browser 5.0
- Opera Browser 5.02
- Opera Browser 5.10
- Opera Browser 5.11
- Opera Browser 5.12
- Opera Browser 6.0
- Opera Browser 6.1
Attack profile CVSS 2.0 · 10.0
- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Complete
- Integrity
- Complete
- Availability
- Complete
Raw vector
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C
Is it in your code?
Hand this to your coding agent. It searches your project for the affected products and checks versions. Nothing leaves your machine.
Read https://cve-list.com/agent/cve/CVE-2008-4292.md and follow it. Check whether this project is affected by CVE-2008-4292. Read only. Don't change anything and don't upload my code. Tell me yes, no or not sure, with the file as proof.
Fix and advisories
- http://secunia.com/advisories/31549
- http://secunia.com/advisories/32538
- http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2008/2416
- http://secunia.com/advisories/31549
- http://secunia.com/advisories/32538
- http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2008/2416
References
- http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=235298
- http://my.opera.com/community/forums/topic.dml?id=241988&t=1222404671&page=1
- http://my.opera.com/yngve/blog/2008/06/27/nobody-checks-the-padlock-debunked-by-opera-users
- http://secunia.com/advisories/31549
- http://secunia.com/advisories/32538
- http://security.gentoo.org/glsa/glsa-200811-01.xml
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2008/09/19/2
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2008/09/24/4
- http://www.opera.com/docs/changelogs/freebsd/952/
- http://www.opera.com/docs/changelogs/linux/952/
- http://www.opera.com/docs/changelogs/mac/952/
- http://www.opera.com/docs/changelogs/solaris/952/
- http://www.opera.com/docs/changelogs/windows/952/
- http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2008/2416
- https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/45589
- http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=235298
- http://my.opera.com/community/forums/topic.dml?id=241988&t=1222404671&page=1
- http://my.opera.com/yngve/blog/2008/06/27/nobody-checks-the-padlock-debunked-by-opera-users
- http://secunia.com/advisories/31549
- http://secunia.com/advisories/32538
- http://security.gentoo.org/glsa/glsa-200811-01.xml
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2008/09/19/2
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2008/09/24/4
- http://www.opera.com/docs/changelogs/freebsd/952/
- http://www.opera.com/docs/changelogs/linux/952/