CVE-2008-3916
What it is
Heap-based buffer overflow in the strip_escapes function in signal.c in GNU ed before 1.0 allows context-dependent or user-assisted attackers to execute arbitrary code via a long filename. NOTE: since ed itself does not typically run with special privileges, this issue only crosses privilege boundaries when ed is invoked as a third-party component.
At a glance
- Exploitability
- Can be exploited over the network without logging in. High risk of data exposure, data tampering, service disruption.
- Exploit odds
- 3.6% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Fix
- No patch or advisory is linked yet. Look at mitigations or restrict exposure.
Timeline
- ReservedThe CVE id was reserved by its CNA
- PublishedDisclosed publicly on CVE.org and NVD
- Last updatedMost recent change to the record
Why it ranks here
- Exploited in the wild: no, CISA does not list it.
- Exploit odds: 3.6% in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Severity: 9.3 HIGH (CVSS).
- Fix: none linked yet, which raises it.
Details
- Published
- Last modified
- Exploit probability
- 3.6% · EPSS, next 30 days
- Weakness
- CWE-119 · Buffer errors
- Record status
- Modified
Affected
- Gnu Ed 0.2
- Gnu Ed 0.3
- Gnu Ed 0.4
- Gnu Ed 0.5
- Gnu Ed 0.6
- Gnu Ed 0.7
- Gnu Ed 0.8
- Gnu Ed 0.9
Attack profile CVSS 2.0 · 9.3
- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Medium
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Complete
- Integrity
- Complete
- Availability
- Complete
Raw vector
AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C
Is it in your code?
Hand this to your coding agent. It searches your project for the affected products and checks versions. Nothing leaves your machine.
Read https://cve-list.com/agent/cve/CVE-2008-3916.md and follow it. Check whether this project is affected by CVE-2008-3916. Read only. Don't change anything and don't upload my code. Tell me yes, no or not sure, with the file as proof.
References
- http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-ed/2008-08/msg00000.html
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2011-01/msg00006.html
- http://lists.vmware.com/pipermail/security-announce/2010/000082.html
- http://secunia.com/advisories/32349
- http://secunia.com/advisories/32460
- http://secunia.com/advisories/33005
- http://secunia.com/advisories/38794
- http://secunia.com/advisories/43068
- http://security.gentoo.org/glsa/glsa-200809-15.xml
- http://support.avaya.com/elmodocs2/security/ASA-2008-461.htm
- http://www.mandriva.com/security/advisories?name=MDVSA-2008:200
- http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2008-0946.html
- http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/501298/100/0/threaded
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/30815
- http://www.securitytracker.com/id?1020734
- http://www.vmware.com/security/advisories/VMSA-2009-0003.html
- http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2008/2642
- http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2008/3347
- http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2010/0528
- http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2011/0212
- https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/44643
- https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A10678
- https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-package-announce/2008-October/msg00847.html
- https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-package-announce/2008-October/msg00873.html
- http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-ed/2008-08/msg00000.html