CVE-2008-2954
What it is
client/NmdcHub.cpp in Linux DC++ (linuxdcpp) before 0.707 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) via an empty private message, which triggers an out-of-bounds read.
At a glance
- Exploitability
- Can be exploited over the network without logging in. High risk of service disruption.
- Exploit odds
- 3.7% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Fix
- No patch or advisory is linked yet. Look at mitigations or restrict exposure.
Timeline
- PublishedDisclosed publicly on CVE.org and NVD
- Last updatedMost recent change to the record
Why it ranks here
- Exploited in the wild: no, CISA does not list it.
- Exploit odds: 3.7% in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Severity: 7.8 HIGH (CVSS).
- Fix: none linked yet, which raises it.
Details
- Published
- Last modified
- Exploit probability
- 3.7% · EPSS, next 30 days
- Weakness
- CWE-20 · Improper input validation
- Record status
- Modified
Affected
- Linux Direct Connect 0.686
- Linux Direct Connect 0.699
- Linux Direct Connect 0.700
- Linux Direct Connect 0.701
- Linux Direct Connect 0.702
- Linux Direct Connect 0.703
- Linux Direct Connect 0.704
- Linux Direct Connect 0.705
Attack profile CVSS 2.0 · 7.8
- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- Complete
Raw vector
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:C
Is it in your code?
Hand this to your coding agent. It searches your project for the affected products and checks versions. Nothing leaves your machine.
Read https://cve-list.com/agent/cve/CVE-2008-2954.md and follow it. Check whether this project is affected by CVE-2008-2954. Read only. Don't change anything and don't upload my code. Tell me yes, no or not sure, with the file as proof.
References
- http://cvs.berlios.de/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/linuxdcpp/linuxdcpp/Changelog.txt
- http://cvs.berlios.de/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/linuxdcpp/linuxdcpp/client/NmdcHub.cpp.diff?r1=1.14&r2=1.15&sortby=date
- http://dcplusplus.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/dcplusplus/dcplusplus/trunk/changelog.txt?r1=1027&r2=1026&pathrev=1027
- http://secunia.com/advisories/30907
- http://secunia.com/advisories/30918
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/30037
- http://www.securitytracker.com/id?1020409
- http://www.securitytracker.com/id?1020410
- https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/43566
- https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-package-announce/2008-July/msg00101.html
- https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-package-announce/2008-July/msg00116.html
- http://cvs.berlios.de/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/linuxdcpp/linuxdcpp/Changelog.txt
- http://cvs.berlios.de/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/linuxdcpp/linuxdcpp/client/NmdcHub.cpp.diff?r1=1.14&r2=1.15&sortby=date
- http://dcplusplus.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/dcplusplus/dcplusplus/trunk/changelog.txt?r1=1027&r2=1026&pathrev=1027
- http://secunia.com/advisories/30907
- http://secunia.com/advisories/30918
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/30037
- http://www.securitytracker.com/id?1020409
- http://www.securitytracker.com/id?1020410
- https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/43566
- https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-package-announce/2008-July/msg00101.html
- https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-package-announce/2008-July/msg00116.html