CVE-2008-2375
What it is
Memory leak in a certain Red Hat deployment of vsftpd before 2.0.5 on Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) 3 and 4, when PAM is used, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory consumption) via a large number of invalid authentication attempts within the same session, a different vulnerability than CVE-2007-5962.
At a glance
- Exploitability
- Can be exploited over the network without logging in. High risk of service disruption.
- Exploit odds
- 3.7% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Fix
- No patch or advisory is linked yet. Look at mitigations or restrict exposure.
Timeline
- PublishedDisclosed publicly on CVE.org and NVD
- Last updatedMost recent change to the record
Why it ranks here
- Exploited in the wild: no, CISA does not list it.
- Exploit odds: 3.7% in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Severity: 7.1 HIGH (CVSS).
- Fix: none linked yet, which raises it.
Details
- Published
- Last modified
- Exploit probability
- 3.7% · EPSS, next 30 days
- Weakness
- CWE-399
- Record status
- Modified
Affected
- Redhat Vsftpd 0.0.1
- Redhat Vsftpd 0.0.2
- Redhat Vsftpd 0.0.3
- Redhat Vsftpd 0.0.4
- Redhat Vsftpd 0.0.5
- Redhat Vsftpd 0.0.6
- Redhat Vsftpd 0.0.7
- Redhat Vsftpd 0.0.8
Attack profile CVSS 2.0 · 7.1
- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Medium
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- Complete
Raw vector
AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:C
Is it in your code?
Hand this to your coding agent. It searches your project for the affected products and checks versions. Nothing leaves your machine.
Read https://cve-list.com/agent/cve/CVE-2008-2375.md and follow it. Check whether this project is affected by CVE-2008-2375. Read only. Don't change anything and don't upload my code. Tell me yes, no or not sure, with the file as proof.
References
- http://secunia.com/advisories/31007
- http://secunia.com/advisories/31223
- http://secunia.com/advisories/32263
- http://support.avaya.com/elmodocs2/security/ASA-2008-398.htm
- http://wiki.rpath.com/Advisories:rPSA-2008-0217
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2008/06/30/2
- http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2008-0579.html
- http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2008-0680.html
- http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/494081/100/0/threaded
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/30364
- http://www.securitytracker.com/id?1020546
- http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2008/2820
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=201051
- https://issues.rpath.com/browse/RPL-2640
- https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A10138
- http://secunia.com/advisories/31007
- http://secunia.com/advisories/31223
- http://secunia.com/advisories/32263
- http://support.avaya.com/elmodocs2/security/ASA-2008-398.htm
- http://wiki.rpath.com/Advisories:rPSA-2008-0217
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2008/06/30/2
- http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2008-0579.html
- http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2008-0680.html
- http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/494081/100/0/threaded
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/30364