CVE-2008-1952
What it is
The backend for XenSource Xen Para Virtualized Frame Buffer (PVFB) in Xen ioemu does not properly restrict the frame buffer size, which allows attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) by mapping an arbitrary amount of guest memory.
At a glance
- Exploitability
- Can be exploited locally on the machine without logging in. Limited direct impact.
- Exploit odds
- 0.4% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Fix
- A patch, advisory or fixed version is referenced. Upgrade or apply it.
Timeline
- PublishedDisclosed publicly on CVE.org and NVD
- Last updatedMost recent change to the record
Why it ranks here
- Exploited in the wild: no, CISA does not list it.
- Exploit odds: 0.4% in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Severity: 2.1 LOW (CVSS).
- Fix: a patch or advisory is linked.
Details
- Published
- Last modified
- Exploit probability
- 0.4% · EPSS, next 30 days
- Weakness
- CWE-119 · Buffer errors
- Record status
- Modified
Affected
- Xensource Xen Para Virtualized Frame Buffer
Attack profile CVSS 2.0 · 2.1
- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- Partial
Raw vector
AV:L/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P
Is it in your code?
Hand this to your coding agent. It searches your project for the affected products and checks versions. Nothing leaves your machine.
Read https://cve-list.com/agent/cve/CVE-2008-1952.md and follow it. Check whether this project is affected by CVE-2008-1952. Read only. Don't change anything and don't upload my code. Tell me yes, no or not sure, with the file as proof.
Fix and advisories
- http://secunia.com/advisories/32088
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2008/05/21/9
- http://xenbits.xensource.com/xen-unstable.hg?rev/9044705960cb30cec385bdca7305bcf7db096721
- http://secunia.com/advisories/32088
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2008/05/21/9
- http://xenbits.xensource.com/xen-unstable.hg?rev/9044705960cb30cec385bdca7305bcf7db096721
References
- http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-devel/2008-05/msg00421.html
- http://secunia.com/advisories/32088
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2008/05/21/9
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/30646
- http://www.securitytracker.com/id?1020957
- http://xenbits.xensource.com/xen-unstable.hg?rev/9044705960cb30cec385bdca7305bcf7db096721
- https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/43362
- https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A11189
- https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0892.html
- http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-devel/2008-05/msg00421.html
- http://secunia.com/advisories/32088
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2008/05/21/9
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/30646
- http://www.securitytracker.com/id?1020957
- http://xenbits.xensource.com/xen-unstable.hg?rev/9044705960cb30cec385bdca7305bcf7db096721
- https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/43362
- https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A11189
- https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0892.html