CVE-2008-1804
What it is
preprocessors/spp_frag3.c in Sourcefire Snort before 2.8.1 does not properly identify packet fragments that have dissimilar TTL values, which allows remote attackers to bypass detection rules by using a different TTL for each fragment.
At a glance
- Exploitability
- Can be exploited over the network without logging in. Limited direct impact.
- Exploit odds
- 2.3% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Fix
- No patch or advisory is linked yet. Look at mitigations or restrict exposure.
Timeline
- PublishedDisclosed publicly on CVE.org and NVD
- Last updatedMost recent change to the record
Why it ranks here
- Exploited in the wild: no, CISA does not list it.
- Exploit odds: 2.3% in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Severity: 6.8 MEDIUM (CVSS).
- Fix: none linked yet, which raises it.
Details
- Published
- Last modified
- Exploit probability
- 2.3% · EPSS, next 30 days
- Record status
- Modified
Affected
- Snort ≤ 2.8.0
Attack profile CVSS 2.0 · 6.8
- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Medium
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Partial
- Integrity
- Partial
- Availability
- Partial
Raw vector
AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
Is it in your code?
Hand this to your coding agent. It searches your project for the affected products and checks versions. Nothing leaves your machine.
Read https://cve-list.com/agent/cve/CVE-2008-1804.md and follow it. Check whether this project is affected by CVE-2008-1804. Read only. Don't change anything and don't upload my code. Tell me yes, no or not sure, with the file as proof.
References
- http://cvs.snort.org/viewcvs.cgi/snort/ChangeLog?rev=1.534.2.11
- http://cvs.snort.org/viewcvs.cgi/snort/src/preprocessors/spp_frag3.c.diff?r1=text&tr1=1.46.2.4&r2=text&tr2=1.46.2.5&diff_format=h
- http://labs.idefense.com/intelligence/vulnerabilities/display.php?id=701
- http://secunia.com/advisories/30348
- http://secunia.com/advisories/30563
- http://secunia.com/advisories/31204
- http://securitytracker.com/id?1020081
- http://www.ipcop.org/index.php?name=News&file=article&sid=40
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/29327
- http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2008/1602
- https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/42584
- https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-package-announce/2008-June/msg00156.html
- https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-package-announce/2008-June/msg00167.html
- https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-package-announce/2008-June/msg00198.html
- http://cvs.snort.org/viewcvs.cgi/snort/ChangeLog?rev=1.534.2.11
- http://cvs.snort.org/viewcvs.cgi/snort/src/preprocessors/spp_frag3.c.diff?r1=text&tr1=1.46.2.4&r2=text&tr2=1.46.2.5&diff_format=h
- http://labs.idefense.com/intelligence/vulnerabilities/display.php?id=701
- http://secunia.com/advisories/30348
- http://secunia.com/advisories/30563
- http://secunia.com/advisories/31204
- http://securitytracker.com/id?1020081
- http://www.ipcop.org/index.php?name=News&file=article&sid=40
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/29327
- http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2008/1602
- https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/42584