CVE-2007-6720
What it is
libmikmod 3.1.9 through 3.2.0, as used by MikMod, SDL-mixer, and possibly other products, relies on the channel count of the last loaded song, rather than the currently playing song, for certain playback calculations, which allows user-assisted attackers to cause a denial of service (application crash) by loading multiple songs (aka MOD files) with different numbers of channels.
At a glance
- Exploitability
- Can be exploited over the network without logging in. Limited direct impact.
- Exploit odds
- 2.3% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Fix
- No patch or advisory is linked yet. Look at mitigations or restrict exposure.
Timeline
- PublishedDisclosed publicly on CVE.org and NVD
- Last updatedMost recent change to the record
Why it ranks here
- Exploited in the wild: no, CISA does not list it.
- Exploit odds: 2.3% in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Severity: 4.3 MEDIUM (CVSS).
- Fix: none linked yet, which raises it.
Details
- Published
- Last modified
- Exploit probability
- 2.3% · EPSS, next 30 days
- Record status
- Modified
Affected
- Igno Saitz Libmikmod 3.1.9-1
- Igno Saitz Libmikmod 3.1.9-2
- Igno Saitz Libmikmod 3.1.9-3
- Igno Saitz Libmikmod 3.1.9-4
- Igno Saitz Libmikmod 3.1.9-5
- Igno Saitz Libmikmod 3.1.9-6
- Igno Saitz Libmikmod 3.1.10-1
- Igno Saitz Libmikmod 3.1.10-2
Attack profile CVSS 2.0 · 4.3
- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Medium
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- Partial
Raw vector
AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P
Is it in your code?
Hand this to your coding agent. It searches your project for the affected products and checks versions. Nothing leaves your machine.
Read https://cve-list.com/agent/cve/CVE-2007-6720.md and follow it. Check whether this project is affected by CVE-2007-6720. Read only. Don't change anything and don't upload my code. Tell me yes, no or not sure, with the file as proof.
References
- http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=422021
- http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=461519
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2009-03/msg00001.html
- http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2009/01/13/2
- http://secunia.com/advisories/34259
- http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/bulletinapr2016-2952098.html
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/33235
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479829
- https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-package-announce/2009-August/msg01305.html
- https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-package-announce/2009-August/msg01312.html
- http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=422021
- http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=461519
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2009-03/msg00001.html
- http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2009/01/13/2
- http://secunia.com/advisories/34259
- http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/bulletinapr2016-2952098.html
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/33235
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479829
- https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-package-announce/2009-August/msg01305.html
- https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-package-announce/2009-August/msg01312.html