CVE-2007-6350
What it is
scponly 4.6 and earlier allows remote authenticated users to bypass intended restrictions and execute code by invoking dangerous subcommands including (1) unison, (2) rsync, (3) svn, and (4) svnserve, as originally demonstrated by creating a Subversion (SVN) repository with malicious hooks, then using svn to trigger execution of those hooks.
At a glance
- Exploitability
- Can be exploited over the network with a login. High risk of data exposure, data tampering, service disruption.
- Exploit odds
- 4.4% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Fix
- A patch, advisory or fixed version is referenced. Upgrade or apply it.
Timeline
- PublishedDisclosed publicly on CVE.org and NVD
- Last updatedMost recent change to the record
Why it ranks here
- Exploited in the wild: no, CISA does not list it.
- Exploit odds: 4.4% in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Severity: 8.5 HIGH (CVSS).
- Fix: a patch or advisory is linked.
Details
- Published
- Last modified
- Exploit probability
- 4.4% · EPSS, next 30 days
- Weakness
- CWE-264
- Record status
- Modified
Affected
- Scponly ≤ 4.6
- Scponly 4.2
- Scponly 4.3
- Scponly 4.4
- Scponly 4.5
Attack profile CVSS 2.0 · 8.5
- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Medium
- Authentication
- Single
- Confidentiality
- Complete
- Integrity
- Complete
- Availability
- Complete
Raw vector
AV:N/AC:M/Au:S/C:C/I:C/A:C
Is it in your code?
Hand this to your coding agent. It searches your project for the affected products and checks versions. Nothing leaves your machine.
Read https://cve-list.com/agent/cve/CVE-2007-6350.md and follow it. Check whether this project is affected by CVE-2007-6350. Read only. Don't change anything and don't upload my code. Tell me yes, no or not sure, with the file as proof.
Fix and advisories
- http://secunia.com/advisories/28123
- http://secunia.com/advisories/28538
- http://secunia.com/advisories/28944
- http://secunia.com/advisories/28981
- http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2007/4243
- http://secunia.com/advisories/28123
- http://secunia.com/advisories/28538
- http://secunia.com/advisories/28944
- http://secunia.com/advisories/28981
- http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2007/4243
References
- http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=437148
- http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=201726
- http://osvdb.org/44137
- http://scponly.cvs.sourceforge.net/scponly/scponly/SECURITY?view=markup
- http://secunia.com/advisories/28123
- http://secunia.com/advisories/28538
- http://secunia.com/advisories/28944
- http://secunia.com/advisories/28981
- http://security.gentoo.org/glsa/glsa-200802-06.xml
- http://www.debian.org/security/2008/dsa-1473
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/26900
- http://www.securitytracker.com/id?1019103
- http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2007/4243
- https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-package-announce/2008-February/msg00546.html
- https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-package-announce/2008-February/msg00595.html
- http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=437148
- http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=201726
- http://osvdb.org/44137
- http://scponly.cvs.sourceforge.net/scponly/scponly/SECURITY?view=markup
- http://secunia.com/advisories/28123
- http://secunia.com/advisories/28538
- http://secunia.com/advisories/28944
- http://secunia.com/advisories/28981
- http://security.gentoo.org/glsa/glsa-200802-06.xml
- http://www.debian.org/security/2008/dsa-1473