CVE-2007-6277
What it is
Multiple buffer overflows in Free Lossless Audio Codec (FLAC) libFLAC before 1.2.1 allow user-assisted remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via large (1) Metadata Block Size, (2) VORBIS Comment String Size, (3) Picture Metadata MIME-TYPE Size, (4) Picture Description Size, (5) Picture Data Length, (6) Padding Length, and (7) PICTURE Metadata width and height values in a .FLAC file, which result in a heap-based overflow; and large (8) VORBIS Comment String Size Length, (9) Picture MIME-Type, (10) Picture MIME-Type URL, and (11) Picture Description Length values in a .FLAC file, which result in a stack-based overflow. NOTE: some of these issues may overlap CVE-2007-4619.
At a glance
- Exploitability
- Can be exploited over the network without logging in. High risk of data exposure, data tampering, service disruption.
- Exploit odds
- 6.7% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Fix
- A patch, advisory or fixed version is referenced. Upgrade or apply it.
Timeline
- PublishedDisclosed publicly on CVE.org and NVD
- Last updatedMost recent change to the record
Why it ranks here
- Exploited in the wild: no, CISA does not list it.
- Exploit odds: 6.7% in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Severity: 9.3 HIGH (CVSS).
- Fix: a patch or advisory is linked.
Details
- Published
- Last modified
- Exploit probability
- 6.7% · EPSS, next 30 days
- Weakness
- CWE-119 · Buffer errors
- Record status
- Modified
Affected
- Flac Libflac ≤ 1.2
Attack profile CVSS 2.0 · 9.3
- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Medium
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Complete
- Integrity
- Complete
- Availability
- Complete
Raw vector
AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C
Is it in your code?
Hand this to your coding agent. It searches your project for the affected products and checks versions. Nothing leaves your machine.
Read https://cve-list.com/agent/cve/CVE-2007-6277.md and follow it. Check whether this project is affected by CVE-2007-6277. Read only. Don't change anything and don't upload my code. Tell me yes, no or not sure, with the file as proof.
Fix and advisories
- http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/544656
- http://www.securitytracker.com/id?1018974
- http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/544656
- http://www.securitytracker.com/id?1018974
References
- http://research.eeye.com/html/advisories/published/AD20071115.html
- http://secunia.com/advisories/28548
- http://securityreason.com/securityalert/3423
- http://www.debian.org/security/2008/dsa-1469
- http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/544656
- http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/483765/100/200/threaded
- http://www.securitytracker.com/id?1018974
- https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A10435
- http://research.eeye.com/html/advisories/published/AD20071115.html
- http://secunia.com/advisories/28548
- http://securityreason.com/securityalert/3423
- http://www.debian.org/security/2008/dsa-1469
- http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/544656
- http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/483765/100/200/threaded
- http://www.securitytracker.com/id?1018974
- https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A10435