CVE-2007-5964
What it is
The default configuration of autofs 5 in some Linux distributions, such as Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) 5, omits the nosuid option for the hosts (/net filesystem) map, which allows local users to gain privileges via a setuid program on a remote NFS server.
At a glance
- Exploitability
- Can be exploited locally on the machine without logging in. High risk of data exposure, data tampering, service disruption.
- Exploit odds
- 0.5% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Fix
- A patch, advisory or fixed version is referenced. Upgrade or apply it.
Timeline
- PublishedDisclosed publicly on CVE.org and NVD
- Last updatedMost recent change to the record
Why it ranks here
- Exploited in the wild: no, CISA does not list it.
- Exploit odds: 0.5% in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Severity: 6.9 MEDIUM (CVSS).
- Fix: a patch or advisory is linked.
Details
- Published
- Last modified
- Exploit probability
- 0.5% · EPSS, next 30 days
- Weakness
- CWE-16
- Record status
- Modified
Affected
- Redhat Enterprise Linux 5.0
Attack profile CVSS 2.0 · 6.9
- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Medium
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Complete
- Integrity
- Complete
- Availability
- Complete
Raw vector
AV:L/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C
Is it in your code?
Hand this to your coding agent. It searches your project for the affected products and checks versions. Nothing leaves your machine.
Read https://cve-list.com/agent/cve/CVE-2007-5964.md and follow it. Check whether this project is affected by CVE-2007-5964. Read only. Don't change anything and don't upload my code. Tell me yes, no or not sure, with the file as proof.
Fix and advisories
- http://secunia.com/advisories/28052
- http://secunia.com/advisories/28097
- http://secunia.com/advisories/28456
- http://secunia.com/advisories/28052
- http://secunia.com/advisories/28097
- http://secunia.com/advisories/28456
References
- http://osvdb.org/40441
- http://secunia.com/advisories/28052
- http://secunia.com/advisories/28097
- http://secunia.com/advisories/28456
- http://securitytracker.com/id?1019087
- http://www.mandriva.com/security/advisories?name=MDVSA-2008:009
- http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2007-1128.html
- http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2007-1129.html
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/26841
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=409701
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=410031
- https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A10158
- https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-package-announce/2007-December/msg00474.html
- https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-package-announce/2007-December/msg00549.html
- http://osvdb.org/40441
- http://secunia.com/advisories/28052
- http://secunia.com/advisories/28097
- http://secunia.com/advisories/28456
- http://securitytracker.com/id?1019087
- http://www.mandriva.com/security/advisories?name=MDVSA-2008:009
- http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2007-1128.html
- http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2007-1129.html
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/26841
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=409701
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=410031