CVE-2007-5740
What it is
The format string protection mechanism in IMAPD for Perdition Mail Retrieval Proxy 1.17 and earlier allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via an IMAP tag with a null byte followed by a format string specifier, which is not counted by the mechanism.
At a glance
- Exploitability
- Can be exploited over the network without logging in. Limited direct impact.
- Exploit odds
- 12.4% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days (EPSS). Higher than most.
- Fix
- A patch, advisory or fixed version is referenced. Upgrade or apply it.
Timeline
- PublishedDisclosed publicly on CVE.org and NVD
- Last updatedMost recent change to the record
Why it ranks here
- Exploited in the wild: no, CISA does not list it.
- Exploit odds: 12.4% in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Severity: 7.5 HIGH (CVSS).
- Fix: a patch or advisory is linked.
Details
- Published
- Last modified
- Exploit probability
- 12.4% · EPSS, next 30 days
- Weakness
- CWE-134
- Record status
- Modified
Affected
- Vergenet Perdition Mail Retrieval Proxy ≤ 1.17
Attack profile CVSS 2.0 · 7.5
- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Partial
- Integrity
- Partial
- Availability
- Partial
Raw vector
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
Is it in your code?
Hand this to your coding agent. It searches your project for the affected products and checks versions. Nothing leaves your machine.
Read https://cve-list.com/agent/cve/CVE-2007-5740.md and follow it. Check whether this project is affected by CVE-2007-5740. Read only. Don't change anything and don't upload my code. Tell me yes, no or not sure, with the file as proof.
Fix and advisories
- http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/fulldisclosure/2007-10/0889.html
- http://secunia.com/advisories/27458
- http://secunia.com/advisories/27520
- http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/fulldisclosure/2007-10/0889.html
- http://secunia.com/advisories/27458
- http://secunia.com/advisories/27520
References
- http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/fulldisclosure/2007-10/0889.html
- http://secunia.com/advisories/27458
- http://secunia.com/advisories/27520
- http://www.debian.org/security/2007/dsa-1398
- http://www.sec-consult.com/300.html
- http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/483034/100/0/threaded
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/26270
- http://www.securitytracker.com/id?1018883
- http://www.vergenet.net/linux/perdition/ChangeLog.shtml
- http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2007/3677
- https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/38184
- http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/fulldisclosure/2007-10/0889.html
- http://secunia.com/advisories/27458
- http://secunia.com/advisories/27520
- http://www.debian.org/security/2007/dsa-1398
- http://www.sec-consult.com/300.html
- http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/483034/100/0/threaded
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/26270
- http://www.securitytracker.com/id?1018883
- http://www.vergenet.net/linux/perdition/ChangeLog.shtml
- http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2007/3677
- https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/38184