CVE-2007-5712
What it is
The internationalization (i18n) framework in Django 0.91, 0.95, 0.95.1, and 0.96, and as used in other products such as PyLucid, when the USE_I18N option and the i18n component are enabled, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory consumption) via many HTTP requests with large Accept-Language headers.
At a glance
- Exploitability
- Can be exploited over the network without logging in. Limited direct impact.
- Exploit odds
- 1.8% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Fix
- A patch, advisory or fixed version is referenced. Upgrade or apply it.
Timeline
- PublishedDisclosed publicly on CVE.org and NVD
- Last updatedMost recent change to the record
Why it ranks here
- Exploited in the wild: no, CISA does not list it.
- Exploit odds: 1.8% in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Severity: 2.6 LOW (CVSS).
- Fix: a patch or advisory is linked.
Details
- Published
- Last modified
- Exploit probability
- 1.8% · EPSS, next 30 days
- Weakness
- CWE-399
- Record status
- Modified
Affected
- Django Project Django 0.91
- Django Project Django 0.95
- Django Project Django 0.95.1
- Django Project Django 0.96
Attack profile CVSS 2.0 · 2.6
- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- High
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- Partial
Raw vector
AV:N/AC:H/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P
Is it in your code?
Hand this to your coding agent. It searches your project for the affected products and checks versions. Nothing leaves your machine.
Read https://cve-list.com/agent/cve/CVE-2007-5712.md and follow it. Check whether this project is affected by CVE-2007-5712. Read only. Don't change anything and don't upload my code. Tell me yes, no or not sure, with the file as proof.
Fix and advisories
- http://secunia.com/advisories/27435
- http://secunia.com/advisories/27597
- http://secunia.com/advisories/31961
- http://www.debian.org/security/2008/dsa-1640
- http://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2007/oct/26/security-fix
- http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2007/3660
- http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2007/3661
- http://secunia.com/advisories/27435
- http://secunia.com/advisories/27597
- http://secunia.com/advisories/31961
References
- http://secunia.com/advisories/27435
- http://secunia.com/advisories/27597
- http://secunia.com/advisories/31961
- http://sourceforge.net/forum/forum.php?forum_id=749199
- http://www.debian.org/security/2008/dsa-1640
- http://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2007/oct/26/security-fix
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/26227
- http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2007/3660
- http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2007/3661
- https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/38143
- https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-package-announce/2007-November/msg00243.html
- https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-package-announce/2007-November/msg00257.html
- http://secunia.com/advisories/27435
- http://secunia.com/advisories/27597
- http://secunia.com/advisories/31961
- http://sourceforge.net/forum/forum.php?forum_id=749199
- http://www.debian.org/security/2008/dsa-1640
- http://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2007/oct/26/security-fix
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/26227
- http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2007/3660
- http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2007/3661
- https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/38143
- https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-package-announce/2007-November/msg00243.html
- https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-package-announce/2007-November/msg00257.html