CVE-2007-4974
What it is
Heap-based buffer overflow in the flac_buffer_copy function in libsndfile 1.0.17 and earlier might allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a FLAC file with crafted PCM data containing a block with a size that exceeds the previous block size.
At a glance
- Exploitability
- Can be exploited over the network without logging in. Limited direct impact.
- Exploit odds
- 4.5% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Fix
- A patch, advisory or fixed version is referenced. Upgrade or apply it.
Timeline
- PublishedDisclosed publicly on CVE.org and NVD
- Last updatedMost recent change to the record
Why it ranks here
- Exploited in the wild: no, CISA does not list it.
- Exploit odds: 4.5% in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Severity: 7.5 HIGH (CVSS).
- Fix: a patch or advisory is linked.
Details
- Published
- Last modified
- Exploit probability
- 4.5% · EPSS, next 30 days
- Weakness
- CWE-119 · Buffer errors
- Record status
- Modified
Affected
- mega-nerd Libsndfile ≤ 1.0.17
- mega-nerd Libsndfile 0.0.8
- mega-nerd Libsndfile 0.0.28
- mega-nerd Libsndfile 1.0.0
- mega-nerd Libsndfile 1.0.1
- mega-nerd Libsndfile 1.0.10
- mega-nerd Libsndfile 1.0.11
- mega-nerd Libsndfile 1.0.12
Attack profile CVSS 2.0 · 7.5
- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Partial
- Integrity
- Partial
- Availability
- Partial
Raw vector
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
Is it in your code?
Hand this to your coding agent. It searches your project for the affected products and checks versions. Nothing leaves your machine.
Read https://cve-list.com/agent/cve/CVE-2007-4974.md and follow it. Check whether this project is affected by CVE-2007-4974. Read only. Don't change anything and don't upload my code. Tell me yes, no or not sure, with the file as proof.
Fix and advisories
- http://secunia.com/advisories/26921
- http://secunia.com/advisories/26932
- http://secunia.com/advisories/27018
- http://secunia.com/advisories/27071
- http://secunia.com/advisories/27100
- http://secunia.com/advisories/28265
- http://secunia.com/advisories/28412
- http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2007/3241
- http://secunia.com/advisories/26921
- http://secunia.com/advisories/26932
References
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2008-01/msg00002.html
- http://secunia.com/advisories/26921
- http://secunia.com/advisories/26932
- http://secunia.com/advisories/27018
- http://secunia.com/advisories/27071
- http://secunia.com/advisories/27100
- http://secunia.com/advisories/28265
- http://secunia.com/advisories/28412
- http://security.gentoo.org/glsa/glsa-200710-04.xml
- http://www.debian.org/security/2007/dsa-1442
- http://www.mandriva.com/security/advisories?name=MDKSA-2007:191
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/25758
- http://www.ubuntu.com/usn/usn-525-1
- http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2007/3241
- https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=192834
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=296221
- https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-package-announce/2007-September/msg00344.html
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2008-01/msg00002.html
- http://secunia.com/advisories/26921
- http://secunia.com/advisories/26932
- http://secunia.com/advisories/27018
- http://secunia.com/advisories/27071
- http://secunia.com/advisories/27100
- http://secunia.com/advisories/28265
- http://secunia.com/advisories/28412