CVE-2007-4567
What it is
The ipv6_hop_jumbo function in net/ipv6/exthdrs.c in the Linux kernel before 2.6.22 does not properly validate the hop-by-hop IPv6 extended header, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (NULL pointer dereference and kernel panic) via a crafted IPv6 packet.
At a glance
- Exploitability
- Can be exploited over the network without logging in. High risk of service disruption.
- Exploit odds
- 14.3% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days (EPSS). Higher than most.
- Fix
- A patch, advisory or fixed version is referenced. Upgrade or apply it.
Timeline
- PublishedDisclosed publicly on CVE.org and NVD
- Last updatedMost recent change to the record
Why it ranks here
- Exploited in the wild: no, CISA does not list it.
- Exploit odds: 14.3% in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Severity: 7.8 HIGH (CVSS).
- Fix: a patch or advisory is linked.
Details
- Published
- Last modified
- Exploit probability
- 14.3% · EPSS, next 30 days
- Weakness
- CWE-20 · Improper input validation
- Record status
- Modified
Affected
- Linux Kernel ≤ 2.6.21.7
- Linux Kernel 2.2.27
- Linux Kernel 2.4.36
- Linux Kernel 2.4.36.1
- Linux Kernel 2.4.36.2
- Linux Kernel 2.4.36.3
- Linux Kernel 2.4.36.4
- Linux Kernel 2.4.36.5
Attack profile CVSS 2.0 · 7.8
- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- Complete
Raw vector
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:C
Is it in your code?
Hand this to your coding agent. It searches your project for the affected products and checks versions. Nothing leaves your machine.
Read https://cve-list.com/agent/cve/CVE-2007-4567.md and follow it. Check whether this project is affected by CVE-2007-4567. Read only. Don't change anything and don't upload my code. Tell me yes, no or not sure, with the file as proof.
Fix and advisories
- http://secunia.com/advisories/25505
- http://secunia.com/advisories/28170
- http://secunia.com/advisories/28706
- http://secunia.com/advisories/38015
- http://secunia.com/advisories/25505
- http://secunia.com/advisories/28170
- http://secunia.com/advisories/28706
- http://secunia.com/advisories/38015
References
- http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8450
- http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git%3Ba=commit%3Bh=e76b2b2567b83448c2ee85a896433b96150c92e6
- http://secunia.com/advisories/25505
- http://secunia.com/advisories/28170
- http://secunia.com/advisories/28706
- http://secunia.com/advisories/38015
- http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2010-0019.html
- http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2010-0053.html
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/26943
- http://www.ubuntu.com/usn/usn-574-1
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=548641
- https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/39171
- https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A11083
- https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A7474
- https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2010-0095.html
- https://usn.ubuntu.com/558-1/
- http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8450
- http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git%3Ba=commit%3Bh=e76b2b2567b83448c2ee85a896433b96150c92e6
- http://secunia.com/advisories/25505
- http://secunia.com/advisories/28170
- http://secunia.com/advisories/28706
- http://secunia.com/advisories/38015
- http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2010-0019.html
- http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2010-0053.html
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/26943