CVE-2007-1359
What it is
Interpretation conflict in ModSecurity (mod_security) 2.1.0 and earlier allows remote attackers to bypass request rules via application/x-www-form-urlencoded POST data that contains an ASCIIZ (0x00) byte, which mod_security treats as a terminator even though it is still processed as normal data by some HTTP parsers including PHP 5.2.0, and possibly parsers in Perl, and Python.
At a glance
- Exploitability
- Can be exploited over the network without logging in. Limited direct impact.
- Exploit odds
- 6.8% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Fix
- A patch, advisory or fixed version is referenced. Upgrade or apply it.
Timeline
- PublishedDisclosed publicly on CVE.org and NVD
- Last updatedMost recent change to the record
Why it ranks here
- Exploited in the wild: no, CISA does not list it.
- Exploit odds: 6.8% in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Severity: 6.8 MEDIUM (CVSS).
- Fix: a patch or advisory is linked.
Details
- Published
- Last modified
- Exploit probability
- 6.8% · EPSS, next 30 days
- Record status
- Modified
Affected
- Mod Security 1.7
- Mod Security 1.7.1
- Mod Security 1.7.2
- Mod Security 1.7.4
- Mod Security 1.7.5
- Mod Security 1.9.4
- Mod Security 2.1
Attack profile CVSS 2.0 · 6.8
- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Medium
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Partial
- Integrity
- Partial
- Availability
- Partial
Raw vector
AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
Is it in your code?
Hand this to your coding agent. It searches your project for the affected products and checks versions. Nothing leaves your machine.
Read https://cve-list.com/agent/cve/CVE-2007-1359.md and follow it. Check whether this project is affected by CVE-2007-1359. Read only. Don't change anything and don't upload my code. Tell me yes, no or not sure, with the file as proof.
Fix and advisories
- http://secunia.com/advisories/24373
- http://www.php-security.org/MOPB/BONUS-12-2007.html
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/22831
- http://secunia.com/advisories/24373
- http://www.php-security.org/MOPB/BONUS-12-2007.html
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/22831
References
- http://h20000.www2.hp.com/bizsupport/TechSupport/Document.jsp?objectID=c00727143
- http://secunia.com/advisories/24373
- http://secunia.com/advisories/25316
- http://secunia.com/advisories/31087
- http://secunia.com/advisories/31113
- http://www.gentoo.org/security/en/glsa/glsa-200705-17.xml
- http://www.modsecurity.org/blog/archives/2007/03/modsecurity_asc.html
- http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/cpujul2008-090335.html
- http://www.osvdb.org/32778
- http://www.php-security.org/MOPB/BONUS-12-2007.html
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/22831
- http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2007/0868
- http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2008/2109/references
- http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2008/2115
- https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/32872
- http://h20000.www2.hp.com/bizsupport/TechSupport/Document.jsp?objectID=c00727143
- http://secunia.com/advisories/24373
- http://secunia.com/advisories/25316
- http://secunia.com/advisories/31087
- http://secunia.com/advisories/31113
- http://www.gentoo.org/security/en/glsa/glsa-200705-17.xml
- http://www.modsecurity.org/blog/archives/2007/03/modsecurity_asc.html
- http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/cpujul2008-090335.html
- http://www.osvdb.org/32778
- http://www.php-security.org/MOPB/BONUS-12-2007.html