CVE-2006-6170
What it is
Buffer overflow in the tls_x509_name_oneline function in the mod_tls module, as used in ProFTPD 1.3.0a and earlier, and possibly other products, allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a large data length argument, a different vulnerability than CVE-2006-5815.
At a glance
- Exploitability
- Can be exploited over the network without logging in. Limited direct impact.
- Exploit odds
- 18.1% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days (EPSS). Higher than most.
- Fix
- A patch, advisory or fixed version is referenced. Upgrade or apply it.
Timeline
- PublishedDisclosed publicly on CVE.org and NVD
- Last updatedMost recent change to the record
Why it ranks here
- Exploited in the wild: no, CISA does not list it.
- Exploit odds: 18.1% in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Severity: 7.5 HIGH (CVSS).
- Fix: a patch or advisory is linked.
Details
- Published
- Last modified
- Exploit probability
- 18.1% · EPSS, next 30 days
- Record status
- Modified
Affected
- Proftpd Project Proftpd ≤ 1.3.0a
Attack profile CVSS 2.0 · 7.5
- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Partial
- Integrity
- Partial
- Availability
- Partial
Raw vector
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
Is it in your code?
Hand this to your coding agent. It searches your project for the affected products and checks versions. Nothing leaves your machine.
Read https://cve-list.com/agent/cve/CVE-2006-6170.md and follow it. Check whether this project is affected by CVE-2006-6170. Read only. Don't change anything and don't upload my code. Tell me yes, no or not sure, with the file as proof.
Fix and advisories
- http://elegerov.blogspot.com/2006/10/do-you-remember-2-years-old-overflow.html
- http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/2006-November/050935.html
- http://secunia.com/advisories/23141
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214820
- http://elegerov.blogspot.com/2006/10/do-you-remember-2-years-old-overflow.html
- http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/2006-November/050935.html
- http://secunia.com/advisories/23141
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214820
References
- http://elegerov.blogspot.com/2006/10/do-you-remember-2-years-old-overflow.html
- http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/2006-November/050935.html
- http://secunia.com/advisories/23141
- http://secunia.com/advisories/23174
- http://secunia.com/advisories/23179
- http://secunia.com/advisories/23184
- http://secunia.com/advisories/23207
- http://slackware.com/security/viewer.php?l=slackware-security&y=2006&m=slackware-security.502491
- http://www.debian.org/security/2006/dsa-1222
- http://www.gentoo.org/security/en/glsa/glsa-200611-26.xml
- http://www.mandriva.com/security/advisories?name=MDKSA-2006:217-1
- http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/452228/100/100/threaded
- http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/452872/100/0/threaded
- http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/452993/100/100/threaded
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/21326
- http://www.trustix.org/errata/2006/0066
- http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2006/4745
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214820
- https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/30554
- http://elegerov.blogspot.com/2006/10/do-you-remember-2-years-old-overflow.html
- http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/2006-November/050935.html
- http://secunia.com/advisories/23141
- http://secunia.com/advisories/23174
- http://secunia.com/advisories/23179
- http://secunia.com/advisories/23184