CVE-2006-3074
What it is
klif.sys in Kaspersky Internet Security 6.0 and 7.0, Kaspersky Anti-Virus (KAV) 6.0 and 7.0, KAV 6.0 for Windows Workstations, and KAV 6.0 for Windows Servers does not validate certain parameters to the (1) NtCreateKey, (2) NtCreateProcess, (3) NtCreateProcessEx, (4) NtCreateSection, (5) NtCreateSymbolicLinkObject, (6) NtCreateThread, (7) NtDeleteValueKey, (8) NtLoadKey2, (9) NtOpenKey, (10) NtOpenProcess, (11) NtOpenSection, and (12) NtQueryValueKey hooked system calls, which allows local users to cause a denial of service (reboot) via an invalid parameter, as demonstrated by the ClientId parameter to NtOpenProcess.
At a glance
- Exploitability
- Can be exploited over the network without logging in. Limited direct impact.
- Exploit odds
- 7.2% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Fix
- A patch, advisory or fixed version is referenced. Upgrade or apply it.
Timeline
- PublishedDisclosed publicly on CVE.org and NVD
- Last updatedMost recent change to the record
Why it ranks here
- Exploited in the wild: no, CISA does not list it.
- Exploit odds: 7.2% in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Severity: 5.0 MEDIUM (CVSS).
- Fix: a patch or advisory is linked.
Details
- Published
- Last modified
- Exploit probability
- 7.2% · EPSS, next 30 days
- Weakness
- CWE-119 · Buffer errors
- Record status
- Modified
Affected
- Kaspersky anti-virus 6.0
- Kaspersky anti-virus 7.0
- Kaspersky Internet Security 6.0
- Kaspersky Internet Security 7.0
Attack profile CVSS 2.0 · 5.0
- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- Partial
Raw vector
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P
Is it in your code?
Hand this to your coding agent. It searches your project for the affected products and checks versions. Nothing leaves your machine.
Read https://cve-list.com/agent/cve/CVE-2006-3074.md and follow it. Check whether this project is affected by CVE-2006-3074. Read only. Don't change anything and don't upload my code. Tell me yes, no or not sure, with the file as proof.
Fix and advisories
- http://secunia.com/advisories/20629
- http://secunia.com/advisories/25603
- http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2006/2333
- http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2007/2145
- http://secunia.com/advisories/20629
- http://secunia.com/advisories/25603
- http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2006/2333
- http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2007/2145
References
- http://secunia.com/advisories/20629
- http://secunia.com/advisories/25603
- http://uninformed.org/index.cgi?v=4&a=4&p=4
- http://uninformed.org/index.cgi?v=4&a=4&p=7
- http://www.kaspersky.com/technews?id=203038695
- http://www.matousec.com/info/advisories/Kaspersky-Multiple-insufficient-argument-validation-of-hooked-SSDT-functions.php
- http://www.rootkit.com/board.php?did=edge726&closed=0&lastx=15
- http://www.rootkit.com/newsread.php?newsid=726
- http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/471453/100/0/threaded
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/18341
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/24491
- http://www.securitytracker.com/id?1018257
- http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2006/2333
- http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2007/2145
- https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/27104
- https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/34875
- http://secunia.com/advisories/20629
- http://secunia.com/advisories/25603
- http://uninformed.org/index.cgi?v=4&a=4&p=4
- http://uninformed.org/index.cgi?v=4&a=4&p=7
- http://www.kaspersky.com/technews?id=203038695
- http://www.matousec.com/info/advisories/Kaspersky-Multiple-insufficient-argument-validation-of-hooked-SSDT-functions.php
- http://www.rootkit.com/board.php?did=edge726&closed=0&lastx=15
- http://www.rootkit.com/newsread.php?newsid=726
- http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/471453/100/0/threaded