CVE-2006-2898
What it is
The IAX2 channel driver (chan_iax2) for Asterisk 1.2.x before 1.2.9 and 1.0.x before 1.0.11 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) and execute arbitrary code via truncated IAX 2 (IAX2) video frames, which bypasses a length check and leads to a buffer overflow involving negative length check. NOTE: the vendor advisory claims that only a DoS is possible, but the original researcher is reliable.
At a glance
- Exploitability
- Can be exploited over the network without logging in. Limited direct impact.
- Exploit odds
- 4.3% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Fix
- A patch, advisory or fixed version is referenced. Upgrade or apply it.
Timeline
- PublishedDisclosed publicly on CVE.org and NVD
- Last updatedMost recent change to the record
Why it ranks here
- Exploited in the wild: no, CISA does not list it.
- Exploit odds: 4.3% in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Severity: 7.5 HIGH (CVSS).
- Fix: a patch or advisory is linked.
Details
- Published
- Last modified
- Exploit probability
- 4.3% · EPSS, next 30 days
- Weakness
- CWE-119 · Buffer errors
- Record status
- Modified
Affected
- Digium Asterisk 1.0.7
- Digium Asterisk 1.0.8
- Digium Asterisk 1.0.9
- Digium Asterisk 1.0.10
- Digium Asterisk 1.2.0_beta1
- Digium Asterisk 1.2.0_beta2
- Digium Asterisk 1.2.6
- Digium Asterisk 1.2.7
Attack profile CVSS 2.0 · 7.5
- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Partial
- Integrity
- Partial
- Availability
- Partial
Raw vector
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
Is it in your code?
Hand this to your coding agent. It searches your project for the affected products and checks versions. Nothing leaves your machine.
Read https://cve-list.com/agent/cve/CVE-2006-2898.md and follow it. Check whether this project is affected by CVE-2006-2898. Read only. Don't change anything and don't upload my code. Tell me yes, no or not sure, with the file as proof.
Fix and advisories
- http://secunia.com/advisories/20497
- http://secunia.com/advisories/20658
- http://secunia.com/advisories/20899
- http://secunia.com/advisories/21222
- http://securitytracker.com/id?1016236
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/18295
- http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2006/2181
- http://secunia.com/advisories/20497
- http://secunia.com/advisories/20658
- http://secunia.com/advisories/20899
References
- http://secunia.com/advisories/20497
- http://secunia.com/advisories/20658
- http://secunia.com/advisories/20899
- http://secunia.com/advisories/21222
- http://securitytracker.com/id?1016236
- http://www.asterisk.org/node/95
- http://www.debian.org/security/2006/dsa-1126
- http://www.gentoo.org/security/en/glsa/glsa-200606-15.xml
- http://www.novell.com/linux/security/advisories/2006_38_security.html
- http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/436127/100/0/threaded
- http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/436671/100/0/threaded
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/18295
- http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2006/2181
- https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/27045
- http://secunia.com/advisories/20497
- http://secunia.com/advisories/20658
- http://secunia.com/advisories/20899
- http://secunia.com/advisories/21222
- http://securitytracker.com/id?1016236
- http://www.asterisk.org/node/95
- http://www.debian.org/security/2006/dsa-1126
- http://www.gentoo.org/security/en/glsa/glsa-200606-15.xml
- http://www.novell.com/linux/security/advisories/2006_38_security.html
- http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/436127/100/0/threaded
- http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/436671/100/0/threaded