CVE-2006-2369
What it is
RealVNC 4.1.1, and other products that use RealVNC such as AdderLink IP and Cisco CallManager, allows remote attackers to bypass authentication via a request in which the client specifies an insecure security type such as "Type 1 - None", which is accepted even if it is not offered by the server, as originally demonstrated using a long password.
At a glance
- Exploitability
- Can be exploited over the network without logging in. Limited direct impact.
- Exploit odds
- 92.4% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days (EPSS). Higher than most.
- Fix
- A patch, advisory or fixed version is referenced. Upgrade or apply it.
Timeline
- ReservedThe CVE id was reserved by its CNA
- PublishedDisclosed publicly on CVE.org and NVD
- Last updatedMost recent change to the record
Why it ranks here
- Exploited in the wild: no, CISA does not list it.
- Exploit odds: 92.4% in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Severity: 7.5 HIGH (CVSS).
- Fix: a patch or advisory is linked.
Details
- Published
- Last modified
- Exploit probability
- 92.4% · EPSS, next 30 days
- Weakness
- CWE-287 · Improper authentication
- Record status
- Modified
Affected
- Vnc Realvnc 4.1.1
Attack profile CVSS 2.0 · 7.5
- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Partial
- Integrity
- Partial
- Availability
- Partial
Raw vector
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
Is it in your code?
Hand this to your coding agent. It searches your project for the affected products and checks versions. Nothing leaves your machine.
Read https://cve-list.com/agent/cve/CVE-2006-2369.md and follow it. Check whether this project is affected by CVE-2006-2369. Read only. Don't change anything and don't upload my code. Tell me yes, no or not sure, with the file as proof.
Fix and advisories
- http://secunia.com/advisories/20107
- http://secunia.com/advisories/20109
- http://secunia.com/advisories/20789
- http://securitytracker.com/id?1016083
- http://www.intelliadmin.com/blog/2006/05/vnc-flaw-proof-of-concept.html
- http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/117929
- http://www.realvnc.com/products/free/4.1/release-notes.html
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/17978
- http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2006/1790
- http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2006/1821
References
- http://marc.info/?l=full-disclosure&m=114768344111131&w=2
- http://marc.info/?l=vnc-list&m=114755444130188&w=2
- http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2022/May/29
- http://secunia.com/advisories/20107
- http://secunia.com/advisories/20109
- http://secunia.com/advisories/20789
- http://securityreason.com/securityalert/8355
- http://securitytracker.com/id?1016083
- http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/707/cisco-sr-20060622-cmm.shtml
- http://www.intelliadmin.com/blog/2006/05/security-flaw-in-realvnc-411.html
- http://www.intelliadmin.com/blog/2006/05/vnc-flaw-proof-of-concept.html
- http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/117929
- http://www.osvdb.org/25479
- http://www.realvnc.com/products/free/4.1/release-notes.html
- http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/433994/100/0/threaded
- http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/434015/100/0/threaded
- http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/434117/100/0/threaded
- http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/434518/100/0/threaded
- http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/434560/100/0/threaded
- http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/438175/100/0/threaded
- http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/438368/100/0/threaded
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/17978
- http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2006/1790
- http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2006/1821
- http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2006/2492