CVE-2006-1297
What it is
Unspecified vulnerability in Veritas Backup Exec for Windows Server Remote Agent 9.1 through 10.1, for Netware Servers and Remote Agent 9.1 and 9.2, and Remote Agent for Linux Servers 10.0 and 10.1 allow attackers to cause a denial of service (application crash or unavailability) due to "memory errors."
At a glance
- Exploitability
- Can be exploited over the network without logging in. Limited direct impact.
- Exploit odds
- 2.2% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Fix
- A patch, advisory or fixed version is referenced. Upgrade or apply it.
Timeline
- PublishedDisclosed publicly on CVE.org and NVD
- Last updatedMost recent change to the record
Why it ranks here
- Exploited in the wild: no, CISA does not list it.
- Exploit odds: 2.2% in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Severity: 5.0 MEDIUM (CVSS).
- Fix: a patch or advisory is linked.
Details
- Published
- Last modified
- Exploit probability
- 2.2% · EPSS, next 30 days
- Record status
- Modified
Affected
- Symantec Veritas Backup Exec netware_server_9.1
- Symantec Veritas Backup Exec netware_server_9.2
- Symantec Veritas Backup Exec Remote Agent netware_server_9.1
- Symantec Veritas Backup Exec Remote Agent netware_server_9.2
- Symantec Veritas Backup Exec Remote Agent unix_linux_server_10.1
- Symantec Veritas Backup Exec Remote Agent windows_server_9.1
- Symantec Veritas Backup Exec Remote Agent windows_server_10.0
- Symantec Veritas Backup Exec Remote Agent windows_server_10.1
Attack profile CVSS 2.0 · 5.0
- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- Partial
Raw vector
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P
Is it in your code?
Hand this to your coding agent. It searches your project for the affected products and checks versions. Nothing leaves your machine.
Read https://cve-list.com/agent/cve/CVE-2006-1297.md and follow it. Check whether this project is affected by CVE-2006-1297. Read only. Don't change anything and don't upload my code. Tell me yes, no or not sure, with the file as proof.
Fix and advisories
- http://secunia.com/advisories/19242
- http://www.symantec.com/avcenter/security/Content/2006.03.17a.html
- http://secunia.com/advisories/19242
- http://www.symantec.com/avcenter/security/Content/2006.03.17a.html
References
- http://secunia.com/advisories/19242
- http://securityreason.com/securityalert/597
- http://securitytracker.com/id?1015784
- http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/428016/100/0/threaded
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/17098
- http://www.symantec.com/avcenter/security/Content/2006.03.17a.html
- http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2006/0995
- https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/25309
- http://secunia.com/advisories/19242
- http://securityreason.com/securityalert/597
- http://securitytracker.com/id?1015784
- http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/428016/100/0/threaded
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/17098
- http://www.symantec.com/avcenter/security/Content/2006.03.17a.html
- http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2006/0995
- https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/25309