CVE-2006-0447
What it is
Multiple buffer overflows in E-Post Mail Server 4.10 and SPA-PRO Mail @Solomon 4.00 allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a long username to the (1) AUTH PLAIN or (2) AUTH LOGIN SMTP commands, which is not properly handled by (a) EPSTRS.EXE or (b) SPA-RS.EXE; (3) a long username in the APOP POP3 command, which is not properly handled by (c) EPSTPOP4S.EXE or (d) SPA-POP3S.EXE; (4) a long IMAP DELETE command, which is not properly handled by (e) EPSTIMAP4S.EXE or (f) SPA-IMAP4S.EXE.
At a glance
- Exploitability
- Can be exploited over the network without logging in. Limited direct impact.
- Exploit odds
- 4.6% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Fix
- A patch, advisory or fixed version is referenced. Upgrade or apply it.
Timeline
- PublishedDisclosed publicly on CVE.org and NVD
- Last updatedMost recent change to the record
Why it ranks here
- Exploited in the wild: no, CISA does not list it.
- Exploit odds: 4.6% in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Severity: 7.5 HIGH (CVSS).
- Fix: a patch or advisory is linked.
Details
- Published
- Last modified
- Exploit probability
- 4.6% · EPSS, next 30 days
- Record status
- Modified
Affected
- e-post Corporation Mail Server 4.10
- e-post Corporation Mail Server enterprise_4.10
- e-post Corporation Smtp Server 4.10
- e-post Corporation Smtp Server enterprise_4.10
- e-post Corporation spa-pro Mail Atsolomon 4.00
- e-post Corporation spa-pro Mail Atsolomon enterprise_4.00
Attack profile CVSS 2.0 · 7.5
- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Partial
- Integrity
- Partial
- Availability
- Partial
Raw vector
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
Is it in your code?
Hand this to your coding agent. It searches your project for the affected products and checks versions. Nothing leaves your machine.
Read https://cve-list.com/agent/cve/CVE-2006-0447.md and follow it. Check whether this project is affected by CVE-2006-0447. Read only. Don't change anything and don't upload my code. Tell me yes, no or not sure, with the file as proof.
Fix and advisories
- http://secunia.com/advisories/18480
- http://secunia.com/secunia_research/2006-1/advisory/
- http://secunia.com/advisories/18480
- http://secunia.com/secunia_research/2006-1/advisory/
References
- http://secunia.com/advisories/18480
- http://secunia.com/secunia_research/2006-1/advisory/
- http://www.osvdb.org/22761
- http://www.osvdb.org/22762
- http://www.osvdb.org/22763
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/16379
- http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2006/0318
- https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/24331
- https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/24333
- https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/24334
- http://secunia.com/advisories/18480
- http://secunia.com/secunia_research/2006-1/advisory/
- http://www.osvdb.org/22761
- http://www.osvdb.org/22762
- http://www.osvdb.org/22763
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/16379
- http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2006/0318
- https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/24331
- https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/24333
- https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/24334