CVE-2006-0049
What it is
gpg in GnuPG before 1.4.2.2 does not properly verify non-detached signatures, which allows attackers to inject unsigned data via a data packet that is not associated with a control packet, which causes the check for concatenated signatures to report that the signature is valid, a different vulnerability than CVE-2006-0455.
At a glance
- Exploitability
- Can be exploited over the network without logging in. Limited direct impact.
- Exploit odds
- 2.4% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Fix
- A patch, advisory or fixed version is referenced. Upgrade or apply it.
Timeline
- PublishedDisclosed publicly on CVE.org and NVD
- Last updatedMost recent change to the record
Why it ranks here
- Exploited in the wild: no, CISA does not list it.
- Exploit odds: 2.4% in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Severity: 5.0 MEDIUM (CVSS).
- Fix: a patch or advisory is linked.
Details
- Published
- Last modified
- Exploit probability
- 2.4% · EPSS, next 30 days
- Record status
- Modified
Affected
- Gnu Privacy Guard 1.0
- Gnu Privacy Guard 1.0.1
- Gnu Privacy Guard 1.0.2
- Gnu Privacy Guard 1.0.3
- Gnu Privacy Guard 1.0.3b
- Gnu Privacy Guard 1.0.4
- Gnu Privacy Guard 1.0.5
- Gnu Privacy Guard 1.0.6
Attack profile CVSS 2.0 · 5.0
- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- Partial
- Availability
- None
Raw vector
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
Is it in your code?
Hand this to your coding agent. It searches your project for the affected products and checks versions. Nothing leaves your machine.
Read https://cve-list.com/agent/cve/CVE-2006-0049.md and follow it. Check whether this project is affected by CVE-2006-0049. Read only. Don't change anything and don't upload my code. Tell me yes, no or not sure, with the file as proof.
Fix and advisories
- http://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnupg-announce/2006q1/000216.html
- http://secunia.com/advisories/19173
- http://securitytracker.com/id?1015749
- http://www.debian.org/security/2006/dsa-993
- http://www.gentoo.org/security/en/glsa/glsa-200603-08.xml
- http://www.osvdb.org/23790
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/17058
- http://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnupg-announce/2006q1/000216.html
- http://secunia.com/advisories/19173
- http://securitytracker.com/id?1015749
References
- ftp://patches.sgi.com/support/free/security/advisories/20060401-01-U
- http://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnupg-announce/2006q1/000216.html
- http://lists.suse.de/archive/suse-security-announce/2006-Mar/0003.html
- http://secunia.com/advisories/19173
- http://secunia.com/advisories/19197
- http://secunia.com/advisories/19203
- http://secunia.com/advisories/19231
- http://secunia.com/advisories/19232
- http://secunia.com/advisories/19234
- http://secunia.com/advisories/19244
- http://secunia.com/advisories/19249
- http://secunia.com/advisories/19287
- http://secunia.com/advisories/19532
- http://securityreason.com/securityalert/450
- http://securityreason.com/securityalert/568
- http://securitytracker.com/id?1015749
- http://www.debian.org/security/2006/dsa-993
- http://www.gentoo.org/security/en/glsa/glsa-200603-08.xml
- http://www.mandriva.com/security/advisories?name=MDKSA-2006:055
- http://www.osvdb.org/23790
- http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-announce-list/2006-March/msg00021.html
- http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2006-0266.html
- http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/427324/100/0/threaded
- http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/433931/100/0/threaded
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/17058