CVE-2005-4900
What it is
SHA-1 is not collision resistant, which makes it easier for context-dependent attackers to conduct spoofing attacks, as demonstrated by attacks on the use of SHA-1 in TLS 1.2. NOTE: this CVE exists to provide a common identifier for referencing this SHA-1 issue; the existence of an identifier is not, by itself, a technology recommendation.
At a glance
- Exploitability
- Can be exploited over the network without logging in. High risk of data exposure.
- Exploit odds
- 0.9% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Fix
- No patch or advisory is linked yet. Look at mitigations or restrict exposure.
Timeline
- PublishedDisclosed publicly on CVE.org and NVD
- Last updatedMost recent change to the record
Why it ranks here
- Exploited in the wild: no, CISA does not list it.
- Exploit odds: 0.9% in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Severity: 5.9 MEDIUM (CVSS).
- Fix: none linked yet, which raises it.
Details
- Published
- Last modified
- Exploit probability
- 0.9% · EPSS, next 30 days
- Weakness
- CWE-326 · Inadequate encryption strength
- Record status
- Modified
Affected
- Google Chrome ≤ 47.0.2526.111
Attack profile CVSS 3.1 · 5.9
- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges needed
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
Raw vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Is it in your code?
Hand this to your coding agent. It searches your project for the affected products and checks versions. Nothing leaves your machine.
Read https://cve-list.com/agent/cve/CVE-2005-4900.md and follow it. Check whether this project is affected by CVE-2005-4900. Read only. Don't change anything and don't upload my code. Tell me yes, no or not sure, with the file as proof.
References
- http://ia.cr/2007/474
- http://shattered.io/
- http://www.cwi.nl/news/2017/cwi-and-google-announce-first-collision-industry-security-standard-sha-1
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/12577
- https://arstechnica.com/security/2017/02/at-deaths-door-for-years-widely-used-sha1-function-is-now-dead/
- https://kc.mcafee.com/corporate/index?page=content&id=SB10340
- https://security.googleblog.com/2015/12/an-update-on-sha-1-certificates-in.html
- https://security.googleblog.com/2017/02/announcing-first-sha1-collision.html
- https://sites.google.com/site/itstheshappening
- https://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2005/02/sha1_broken.html
- https://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2005/08/new_cryptanalyt.html
- http://ia.cr/2007/474
- http://shattered.io/
- http://www.cwi.nl/news/2017/cwi-and-google-announce-first-collision-industry-security-standard-sha-1
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/12577
- https://arstechnica.com/security/2017/02/at-deaths-door-for-years-widely-used-sha1-function-is-now-dead/
- https://kc.mcafee.com/corporate/index?page=content&id=SB10340
- https://security.googleblog.com/2015/12/an-update-on-sha-1-certificates-in.html
- https://security.googleblog.com/2017/02/announcing-first-sha1-collision.html
- https://sites.google.com/site/itstheshappening
- https://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2005/02/sha1_broken.html
- https://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2005/08/new_cryptanalyt.html