CVE-2005-3774
What it is
Cisco PIX 6.3 and 7.0 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (blocked new connections) via spoofed TCP packets that cause the PIX to create embryonic connections that that would not produce a valid connection with the end system, including (1) SYN packets with invalid checksums, which do not result in a RST; or, from an external interface, (2) one byte of "meaningless data," or (3) a TTL that is one less than needed to reach the internal destination.
At a glance
- Exploitability
- Can be exploited over the network without logging in. Limited direct impact.
- Exploit odds
- 18.2% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days (EPSS). Higher than most.
- Fix
- A patch, advisory or fixed version is referenced. Upgrade or apply it.
Timeline
- PublishedDisclosed publicly on CVE.org and NVD
- Last updatedMost recent change to the record
Why it ranks here
- Exploited in the wild: no, CISA does not list it.
- Exploit odds: 18.2% in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Severity: 5.0 MEDIUM (CVSS).
- Fix: a patch or advisory is linked.
Details
- Published
- Last modified
- Exploit probability
- 18.2% · EPSS, next 30 days
- Record status
- Modified
Affected
- Cisco Pix 6.3
- Cisco Pix 7.0
Attack profile CVSS 2.0 · 5.0
- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- Partial
Raw vector
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P
Is it in your code?
Hand this to your coding agent. It searches your project for the affected products and checks versions. Nothing leaves your machine.
Read https://cve-list.com/agent/cve/CVE-2005-3774.md and follow it. Check whether this project is affected by CVE-2005-3774. Read only. Don't change anything and don't upload my code. Tell me yes, no or not sure, with the file as proof.
Fix and advisories
- http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/2005-November/038971.html
- http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/2005-November/038971.html
References
- http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/2005-November/038971.html
- http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/2005-November/038983.html
- http://secunia.com/advisories/17670
- http://securitytracker.com/id?1015256
- http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/vpndevc/ps2030/products_security_notice09186a0080624a37.html
- http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/707/cisco-response-20051122-pix.shtml
- http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/853540
- http://www.osvdb.org/24140
- http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/417458/30/0/threaded
- http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/426989/100/0/threaded
- http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/426991/100/0/threaded
- http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/427041/100/0/threaded
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/15525
- http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2005/2546
- https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/25077
- https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/25079
- http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/2005-November/038971.html
- http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/2005-November/038983.html
- http://secunia.com/advisories/17670
- http://securitytracker.com/id?1015256
- http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/vpndevc/ps2030/products_security_notice09186a0080624a37.html
- http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/707/cisco-response-20051122-pix.shtml
- http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/853540
- http://www.osvdb.org/24140
- http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/417458/30/0/threaded