CVE-2005-3149
What it is
Uim 0.4.x before 0.4.9.1 and 0.5.0 and earlier does not properly handle the LIBUIM_VANILLA environment variable when a suid or sgid application is linked to libuim, such as immodule for Qt, which allows local users to gain privileges.
At a glance
- Exploitability
- Can be exploited locally on the machine without logging in. Limited direct impact.
- Exploit odds
- 0.4% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Fix
- A patch, advisory or fixed version is referenced. Upgrade or apply it.
Timeline
- PublishedDisclosed publicly on CVE.org and NVD
- Last updatedMost recent change to the record
Why it ranks here
- Exploited in the wild: no, CISA does not list it.
- Exploit odds: 0.4% in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Severity: 4.6 MEDIUM (CVSS).
- Fix: a patch or advisory is linked.
Details
- Published
- Last modified
- Exploit probability
- 0.4% · EPSS, next 30 days
- Record status
- Modified
Affected
- Uim ≤ 0.5.0
Attack profile CVSS 2.0 · 4.6
- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Partial
- Integrity
- Partial
- Availability
- Partial
Raw vector
AV:L/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
Is it in your code?
Hand this to your coding agent. It searches your project for the affected products and checks versions. Nothing leaves your machine.
Read https://cve-list.com/agent/cve/CVE-2005-3149.md and follow it. Check whether this project is affected by CVE-2005-3149. Read only. Don't change anything and don't upload my code. Tell me yes, no or not sure, with the file as proof.
Fix and advisories
- http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=331620
- http://lists.freedesktop.org/pipermail/uim/2005-September/001346.html
- http://lists.freedesktop.org/pipermail/uim/2005-September/001347.html
- http://secunia.com/advisories/17043
- http://www.gentoo.org/security/en/glsa/glsa-200510-03.xml
- http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=331620
- http://lists.freedesktop.org/pipermail/uim/2005-September/001346.html
- http://lists.freedesktop.org/pipermail/uim/2005-September/001347.html
- http://secunia.com/advisories/17043
- http://www.gentoo.org/security/en/glsa/glsa-200510-03.xml
References
- http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=331620
- http://lists.freedesktop.org/pipermail/uim/2005-September/001346.html
- http://lists.freedesktop.org/pipermail/uim/2005-September/001347.html
- http://secunia.com/advisories/17043
- http://secunia.com/advisories/17058
- http://secunia.com/advisories/17572
- http://securitytracker.com/id?1015002
- http://www.debian.org/security/2005/dsa-895
- http://www.gentoo.org/security/en/glsa/glsa-200510-03.xml
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/15007
- http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2005/1946
- http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2005/1947
- http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=331620
- http://lists.freedesktop.org/pipermail/uim/2005-September/001346.html
- http://lists.freedesktop.org/pipermail/uim/2005-September/001347.html
- http://secunia.com/advisories/17043
- http://secunia.com/advisories/17058
- http://secunia.com/advisories/17572
- http://securitytracker.com/id?1015002
- http://www.debian.org/security/2005/dsa-895
- http://www.gentoo.org/security/en/glsa/glsa-200510-03.xml
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/15007
- http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2005/1946
- http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2005/1947