CVE-2005-0441
What it is
Multiple stack-based buffer overflows in Sybase Adaptive Server Enterprise (ASE) 12.x before 12.5.3 ESD#1 allow remote authenticated users to execute arbitrary code via the (1) attrib_valid function, (2) covert function, (3) declare statement, or (4) a crafted query plan, or remote authenticated users with database owner or "sa" role privileges to execute arbitrary code via (5) a crafted install java statement.
At a glance
- Exploitability
- Can be exploited over the network without logging in. High risk of data exposure, data tampering, service disruption.
- Exploit odds
- 8.5% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Fix
- A patch, advisory or fixed version is referenced. Upgrade or apply it.
Timeline
- PublishedDisclosed publicly on CVE.org and NVD
- Last updatedMost recent change to the record
Why it ranks here
- Exploited in the wild: no, CISA does not list it.
- Exploit odds: 8.5% in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Severity: 10.0 HIGH (CVSS).
- Fix: a patch or advisory is linked.
Details
- Published
- Last modified
- Exploit probability
- 8.5% · EPSS, next 30 days
- Record status
- Modified
Affected
- Sybase Adaptive Server Enterprise 11.03.3
- Sybase Adaptive Server Enterprise 11.5
- Sybase Adaptive Server Enterprise 11.5.1
- Sybase Adaptive Server Enterprise 11.9.2
- Sybase Adaptive Server Enterprise 12.0
- Sybase Adaptive Server Enterprise 12.0.1
- Sybase Adaptive Server Enterprise 12.5
- Sybase Adaptive Server Enterprise 12.5.2
Attack profile CVSS 2.0 · 10.0
- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Complete
- Integrity
- Complete
- Availability
- Complete
Raw vector
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C
Is it in your code?
Hand this to your coding agent. It searches your project for the affected products and checks versions. Nothing leaves your machine.
Read https://cve-list.com/agent/cve/CVE-2005-0441.md and follow it. Check whether this project is affected by CVE-2005-0441. Read only. Don't change anything and don't upload my code. Tell me yes, no or not sure, with the file as proof.
Fix and advisories
- http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/bugtraq/2004-12/0315.html
- http://secunia.com/advisories/13632
- http://www.ngssoftware.com/advisories/sybase-ase.txt
- http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/393851
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/12080
- http://www.sybase.com/detail?id=1034520
- http://www.sybase.com/detail?id=1034752
- http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/bugtraq/2004-12/0315.html
- http://secunia.com/advisories/13632
- http://www.ngssoftware.com/advisories/sybase-ase.txt
References
- http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/bugtraq/2004-12/0315.html
- http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=111272918117194&w=2
- http://secunia.com/advisories/13632
- http://www.ngssoftware.com/advisories/sybase-ase.txt
- http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/393851
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/12080
- http://www.sybase.com/detail/1%2C6904%2C1033894%2C00.html
- http://www.sybase.com/detail?id=1034520
- http://www.sybase.com/detail?id=1034752
- https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/19354
- https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/19974
- https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/19976
- https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/19978
- https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/19979
- https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/19980
- http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/bugtraq/2004-12/0315.html
- http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=111272918117194&w=2
- http://secunia.com/advisories/13632
- http://www.ngssoftware.com/advisories/sybase-ase.txt
- http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/393851
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/12080
- http://www.sybase.com/detail/1%2C6904%2C1033894%2C00.html
- http://www.sybase.com/detail?id=1034520
- http://www.sybase.com/detail?id=1034752
- https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/19354