CVE-2005-0124
What it is
The coda_pioctl function in the coda functionality (pioctl.c) for Linux kernel 2.6.9 and 2.4.x before 2.4.29 may allow local users to cause a denial of service (crash) or execute arbitrary code via negative vi.in_size or vi.out_size values, which may trigger a buffer overflow.
At a glance
- Exploitability
- Can be exploited locally on the machine without logging in. Limited direct impact.
- Exploit odds
- 0.6% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Fix
- A patch, advisory or fixed version is referenced. Upgrade or apply it.
Timeline
- PublishedDisclosed publicly on CVE.org and NVD
- Last updatedMost recent change to the record
Why it ranks here
- Exploited in the wild: no, CISA does not list it.
- Exploit odds: 0.6% in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Severity: 2.1 LOW (CVSS).
- Fix: a patch or advisory is linked.
Details
- Published
- Last modified
- Exploit probability
- 0.6% · EPSS, next 30 days
- Record status
- Modified
Affected
- Linux Kernel 2.4.0
- Linux Kernel 2.4.1
- Linux Kernel 2.4.2
- Linux Kernel 2.4.3
- Linux Kernel 2.4.4
- Linux Kernel 2.4.5
- Linux Kernel 2.4.6
- Linux Kernel 2.4.7
Attack profile CVSS 2.0 · 2.1
- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- Partial
Raw vector
AV:L/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P
Is it in your code?
Hand this to your coding agent. It searches your project for the affected products and checks versions. Nothing leaves your machine.
Read https://cve-list.com/agent/cve/CVE-2005-0124.md and follow it. Check whether this project is affected by CVE-2005-0124. Read only. Don't change anything and don't upload my code. Tell me yes, no or not sure, with the file as proof.
Fix and advisories
- http://seclists.org/lists/linux-kernel/2005/Jan/2018.html
- http://seclists.org/lists/linux-kernel/2005/Jan/2018.html
References
- http://seclists.org/lists/linux-kernel/2004/Dec/3914.html
- http://seclists.org/lists/linux-kernel/2005/Jan/1089.html
- http://seclists.org/lists/linux-kernel/2005/Jan/2018.html
- http://seclists.org/lists/linux-kernel/2005/Jan/2020.html
- http://secunia.com/advisories/17002
- http://secunia.com/advisories/18684
- http://secunia.com/advisories/19374
- http://secunia.com/advisories/20163
- http://secunia.com/advisories/20202
- http://secunia.com/advisories/20338
- http://securitytracker.com/id?1013018
- http://www.debian.org/security/2006/dsa-1017
- http://www.debian.org/security/2006/dsa-1067
- http://www.debian.org/security/2006/dsa-1069
- http://www.debian.org/security/2006/dsa-1070
- http://www.debian.org/security/2006/dsa-1082
- http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2005-663.html
- http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2006-0191.html
- http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/428028/100/0/threaded
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/14967
- http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2005/1878
- https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A11690
- http://seclists.org/lists/linux-kernel/2004/Dec/3914.html
- http://seclists.org/lists/linux-kernel/2005/Jan/1089.html
- http://seclists.org/lists/linux-kernel/2005/Jan/2018.html