CVE-2004-2551
What it is
Multiple SQL injection vulnerabilities in Layton HelpBox 3.0.1 allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary SQL commands via (1) the sys_comment_id parameter in editcommentenduser.asp, (2) the sys_suspend_id parameter in editsuspensionuser.asp, (3) the table parameter in export_data.asp, (4) the sys_analgroup parameter in manageanalgrouppreference.asp, (5) the sys_asset_id parameter in quickinfoassetrequests.asp, (6) the sys_eusername parameter in quickinfoenduserrequests.asp, and the sys_request_id parameter in (7) requestauditlog.asp, (8) requestcommentsenduser.asp, (9) selectrequestapplytemplate.asp, and (10) selectrequestlink.asp, resulting in an ability to create a new HelpBox user account and read, modify, or delete data from the backend database.
At a glance
- Exploitability
- Can be exploited over the network without logging in. Limited direct impact.
- Exploit odds
- 2.3% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Fix
- A patch, advisory or fixed version is referenced. Upgrade or apply it.
Timeline
- PublishedDisclosed publicly on CVE.org and NVD
- Last updatedMost recent change to the record
Why it ranks here
- Exploited in the wild: no, CISA does not list it.
- Exploit odds: 2.3% in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Severity: 7.5 HIGH (CVSS).
- Fix: a patch or advisory is linked.
Details
- Published
- Last modified
- Exploit probability
- 2.3% · EPSS, next 30 days
- Record status
- Modified
Affected
- Layton Technology Helpbox 3.0.1
Attack profile CVSS 2.0 · 7.5
- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Partial
- Integrity
- Partial
- Availability
- Partial
Raw vector
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
Is it in your code?
Hand this to your coding agent. It searches your project for the affected products and checks versions. Nothing leaves your machine.
Read https://cve-list.com/agent/cve/CVE-2004-2551.md and follow it. Check whether this project is affected by CVE-2004-2551. Read only. Don't change anything and don't upload my code. Tell me yes, no or not sure, with the file as proof.
Fix and advisories
- http://secunia.com/advisories/12118
- http://www.osvdb.org/8170
- http://www.osvdb.org/8171
- http://www.osvdb.org/8172
- http://www.osvdb.org/8173
- http://www.osvdb.org/8174
- http://www.osvdb.org/8175
- http://www.osvdb.org/8176
- http://www.osvdb.org/8177
- http://www.osvdb.org/8178
References
- http://secunia.com/advisories/12118
- http://www.osvdb.org/8170
- http://www.osvdb.org/8171
- http://www.osvdb.org/8172
- http://www.osvdb.org/8173
- http://www.osvdb.org/8174
- http://www.osvdb.org/8175
- http://www.osvdb.org/8176
- http://www.osvdb.org/8177
- http://www.osvdb.org/8178
- http://www.osvdb.org/8179
- http://www.securiteam.com/windowsntfocus/5VP0S0ADFW.html
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/10776
- https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/16772
- https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/16774
- http://secunia.com/advisories/12118
- http://www.osvdb.org/8170
- http://www.osvdb.org/8171
- http://www.osvdb.org/8172
- http://www.osvdb.org/8173
- http://www.osvdb.org/8174
- http://www.osvdb.org/8175
- http://www.osvdb.org/8176
- http://www.osvdb.org/8177
- http://www.osvdb.org/8178