CVE-2004-1095
What it is
Multiple integer overflows in (1) readbmp.c, (2) readgif.c, (3) readgif.c, (4) readmrf.c, (5) readpcx.c, (6) readpng.c,(7) readpnm.c, (8) readprf.c, (9) readtiff.c, (10) readxbm.c, (11) readxpm.c in zgv 5.8 allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via certain image headers that cause calculations to be overflowed and small buffers to be allocated, leading to buffer overflows. NOTE: CVE-2004-0994 and CVE-2004-1095 identify sets of bugs that only partially overlap, despite having the same developer. Therefore, they should be regarded as distinct.
At a glance
- Exploitability
- Can be exploited over the network without logging in. High risk of data exposure, data tampering, service disruption.
- Exploit odds
- 9.4% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Fix
- A patch, advisory or fixed version is referenced. Upgrade or apply it.
Timeline
- PublishedDisclosed publicly on CVE.org and NVD
- Last updatedMost recent change to the record
Why it ranks here
- Exploited in the wild: no, CISA does not list it.
- Exploit odds: 9.4% in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Severity: 10.0 HIGH (CVSS).
- Fix: a patch or advisory is linked.
Details
- Published
- Last modified
- Exploit probability
- 9.4% · EPSS, next 30 days
- Record status
- Modified
Affected
- Zgv Xzgv Image Viewer 0.6
- Zgv Xzgv Image Viewer 0.7
- Zgv Xzgv Image Viewer 0.8
- Zgv Image Viewer 5.5
- Zgv Image Viewer 5.6
- Zgv Image Viewer 5.7
- Zgv Image Viewer 5.8
- Debian Linux 3.0
Attack profile CVSS 2.0 · 10.0
- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Complete
- Integrity
- Complete
- Availability
- Complete
Raw vector
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C
Is it in your code?
Hand this to your coding agent. It searches your project for the affected products and checks versions. Nothing leaves your machine.
Read https://cve-list.com/agent/cve/CVE-2004-1095.md and follow it. Check whether this project is affected by CVE-2004-1095. Read only. Don't change anything and don't upload my code. Tell me yes, no or not sure, with the file as proof.
Fix and advisories
References
- http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=109886210702781&w=2
- http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=109898111915661&w=2
- http://www.gentoo.org/security/en/glsa/glsa-200411-12.xml
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/11556
- http://www.svgalib.org/rus/zgv/
- http://www.svgalib.org/rus/zgv/zgv-5.8-integer-overflow-fix.diff
- https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/17871
- http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=109886210702781&w=2
- http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=109898111915661&w=2
- http://www.gentoo.org/security/en/glsa/glsa-200411-12.xml
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/11556
- http://www.svgalib.org/rus/zgv/
- http://www.svgalib.org/rus/zgv/zgv-5.8-integer-overflow-fix.diff
- https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/17871