CVE-2004-1012
What it is
The argument parser of the PARTIAL command in Cyrus IMAP Server 2.2.6 and earlier allows remote authenticated users to execute arbitrary code via a certain command ("body[p") that is treated as a different command ("body.peek") and causes an index increment error that leads to an out-of-bounds memory corruption.
At a glance
- Exploitability
- Can be exploited over the network without logging in. High risk of data exposure, data tampering, service disruption.
- Exploit odds
- 6.0% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Fix
- No patch or advisory is linked yet. Look at mitigations or restrict exposure.
Timeline
- PublishedDisclosed publicly on CVE.org and NVD
- Last updatedMost recent change to the record
Why it ranks here
- Exploited in the wild: no, CISA does not list it.
- Exploit odds: 6.0% in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Severity: 10.0 HIGH (CVSS).
- Fix: none linked yet, which raises it.
Details
- Published
- Last modified
- Exploit probability
- 6.0% · EPSS, next 30 days
- Record status
- Modified
Affected
- Carnegie Mellon University Cyrus Imap Server 2.1.7
- Carnegie Mellon University Cyrus Imap Server 2.1.9
- Carnegie Mellon University Cyrus Imap Server 2.1.10
- Carnegie Mellon University Cyrus Imap Server 2.1.16
- Carnegie Mellon University Cyrus Imap Server 2.2.0_alpha
- Carnegie Mellon University Cyrus Imap Server 2.2.1_beta
- Carnegie Mellon University Cyrus Imap Server 2.2.2_beta
- Carnegie Mellon University Cyrus Imap Server 2.2.3
Attack profile CVSS 2.0 · 10.0
- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Complete
- Integrity
- Complete
- Availability
- Complete
Raw vector
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C
Is it in your code?
Hand this to your coding agent. It searches your project for the affected products and checks versions. Nothing leaves your machine.
Read https://cve-list.com/agent/cve/CVE-2004-1012.md and follow it. Check whether this project is affected by CVE-2004-1012. Read only. Don't change anything and don't upload my code. Tell me yes, no or not sure, with the file as proof.
References
- http://asg.web.cmu.edu/archive/message.php?mailbox=archive.cyrus-announce&msg=143
- http://asg.web.cmu.edu/cyrus/download/imapd/changes.html
- http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=110123023521619&w=2
- http://secunia.com/advisories/13274/
- http://security.e-matters.de/advisories/152004.html
- http://security.gentoo.org/glsa/glsa-200411-34.xml
- http://www.debian.org/security/2004/dsa-597
- http://www.mandriva.com/security/advisories?name=MDKSA-2004:139
- https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/18199
- https://www.ubuntu.com/usn/usn-31-1/
- http://asg.web.cmu.edu/archive/message.php?mailbox=archive.cyrus-announce&msg=143
- http://asg.web.cmu.edu/cyrus/download/imapd/changes.html
- http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=110123023521619&w=2
- http://secunia.com/advisories/13274/
- http://security.e-matters.de/advisories/152004.html
- http://security.gentoo.org/glsa/glsa-200411-34.xml
- http://www.debian.org/security/2004/dsa-597
- http://www.mandriva.com/security/advisories?name=MDKSA-2004:139
- https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/18199
- https://www.ubuntu.com/usn/usn-31-1/