CVE-2004-0565
What it is
Floating point information leak in the context switch code for Linux 2.4.x only checks the MFH bit but does not verify the FPH owner, which allows local users to read register values of other processes by setting the MFH bit.
At a glance
- Exploitability
- Can be exploited locally on the machine without logging in. Limited direct impact.
- Exploit odds
- 0.4% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Fix
- A patch, advisory or fixed version is referenced. Upgrade or apply it.
Timeline
- PublishedDisclosed publicly on CVE.org and NVD
- Last updatedMost recent change to the record
Why it ranks here
- Exploited in the wild: no, CISA does not list it.
- Exploit odds: 0.4% in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Severity: 2.1 LOW (CVSS).
- Fix: a patch or advisory is linked.
Details
- Published
- Last modified
- Exploit probability
- 0.4% · EPSS, next 30 days
- Record status
- Modified
Affected
- Mandrakesoft Mandrake Multi Network Firewall 8.2
- Gentoo Linux
- Linux Kernel 2.4.0
- Mandrakesoft Mandrake Linux 9.1
- Mandrakesoft Mandrake Linux 9.2
- Mandrakesoft Mandrake Linux 10.0
- Mandrakesoft Mandrake Linux Corporate Server 2.1
- Trustix Secure Linux 2
Attack profile CVSS 2.0 · 2.1
- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Partial
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
Raw vector
AV:L/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
Is it in your code?
Hand this to your coding agent. It searches your project for the affected products and checks versions. Nothing leaves your machine.
Read https://cve-list.com/agent/cve/CVE-2004-0565.md and follow it. Check whether this project is affected by CVE-2004-0565. Read only. Don't change anything and don't upload my code. Tell me yes, no or not sure, with the file as proof.
Fix and advisories
- http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/linux/owl/2004-q2/0038.html
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=124734
- http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/linux/owl/2004-q2/0038.html
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=124734
References
- http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/linux/owl/2004-q2/0038.html
- http://secunia.com/advisories/20162
- http://secunia.com/advisories/20163
- http://secunia.com/advisories/20202
- http://secunia.com/advisories/20338
- http://www.debian.org/security/2006/dsa-1067
- http://www.debian.org/security/2006/dsa-1069
- http://www.debian.org/security/2006/dsa-1070
- http://www.debian.org/security/2006/dsa-1082
- http://www.mandriva.com/security/advisories?name=MDKSA-2004:066
- http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2004-504.html
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/10687
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=124734
- https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/16644
- https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A10714
- http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/linux/owl/2004-q2/0038.html
- http://secunia.com/advisories/20162
- http://secunia.com/advisories/20163
- http://secunia.com/advisories/20202
- http://secunia.com/advisories/20338
- http://www.debian.org/security/2006/dsa-1067
- http://www.debian.org/security/2006/dsa-1069
- http://www.debian.org/security/2006/dsa-1070
- http://www.debian.org/security/2006/dsa-1082
- http://www.mandriva.com/security/advisories?name=MDKSA-2004:066