CVE-2004-0488
What it is
Stack-based buffer overflow in the ssl_util_uuencode_binary function in ssl_util.c for Apache mod_ssl, when mod_ssl is configured to trust the issuing CA, may allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a client certificate with a long subject DN.
At a glance
- Exploitability
- Can be exploited over the network without logging in. Limited direct impact.
- Exploit odds
- 37.7% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days (EPSS). Higher than most.
- Fix
- A patch, advisory or fixed version is referenced. Upgrade or apply it.
Timeline
- PublishedDisclosed publicly on CVE.org and NVD
- Last updatedMost recent change to the record
Why it ranks here
- Exploited in the wild: no, CISA does not list it.
- Exploit odds: 37.7% in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Severity: 7.5 HIGH (CVSS).
- Fix: a patch or advisory is linked.
Details
- Published
- Last modified
- Exploit probability
- 37.7% · EPSS, next 30 days
- Weakness
- CWE-787 · Out-of-bounds write
- Record status
- Modified
Affected
- Apache Http Server < 2.0.50
- Debian Linux 3.0
- Redhat Enterprise Linux Server 2.0
- Redhat Enterprise Linux Workstation 2.0
Attack profile CVSS 2.0 · 7.5
- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Partial
- Integrity
- Partial
- Availability
- Partial
Raw vector
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
Is it in your code?
Hand this to your coding agent. It searches your project for the affected products and checks versions. Nothing leaves your machine.
Read https://cve-list.com/agent/cve/CVE-2004-0488.md and follow it. Check whether this project is affected by CVE-2004-0488. Read only. Don't change anything and don't upload my code. Tell me yes, no or not sure, with the file as proof.
Fix and advisories
References
- ftp://patches.sgi.com/support/free/security/advisories/20040605-01-U.asc
- http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/2004-May/021610.html
- http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=108567431823750&w=2
- http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=108619129727620&w=2
- http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=109181600614477&w=2
- http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=109215056218824&w=2
- http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2004-245.html
- http://security.gentoo.org/glsa/glsa-200406-05.xml
- http://www.debian.org/security/2004/dsa-532
- http://www.mandriva.com/security/advisories?name=MDKSA-2004:054
- http://www.mandriva.com/security/advisories?name=MDKSA-2004:055
- http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2004-342.html
- http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2004-405.html
- http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2005-816.html
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/10355
- http://www.trustix.net/errata/2004/0031/
- https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1888
- https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/16214
- https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/54a42d4b01968df1117cea77fc53d6beb931c0e05936ad02af93e9ac%40%3Ccvs.httpd.apache.org%3E
- https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/5df9bfb86a3b054bb985a45ff9250b0332c9ecc181eec232489e7f79%40%3Ccvs.httpd.apache.org%3E
- https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r0276683d8e1e07153fc8642618830ac0ade85b9ae0dc7b07f63bb8fc%40%3Ccvs.httpd.apache.org%3E
- https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r2cb985de917e7da0848c440535f65a247754db8b2154a10089e4247b%40%3Ccvs.httpd.apache.org%3E
- https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r5001ecf3d6b2bdd0b732e527654248abb264f08390045d30709a92f6%40%3Ccvs.httpd.apache.org%3E
- https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r8828e649175df56f1f9e3919938ac7826128525426e2748f0ab62feb%40%3Ccvs.httpd.apache.org%3E
- https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r9e8622254184645bc963a1d47c5d47f6d5a36d6f080d8d2c43b2b142%40%3Ccvs.httpd.apache.org%3E